AI Overview...
-
Legal Proceedings and Case References - The case of Satendra Kumar Antil has been cited multiple times in various judgments concerning investigation procedures, bail, and procedural fairness. Notably, the Supreme Court emphasized the importance of honest disclosure and proper investigation in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI (2021 SCC Online SC 922) and Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI & Anr. (2022 SCC 51) Ravendra Shukla VS State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrtt. Govt. Lko. - Allahabad, Sanjeev @ Kallu Sethiya VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, Abhishek Yadav @ Laloo VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.
-
Investigation Procedures and Rights of Accused - The Court highlighted violations of procedural law, such as failure to issue notices under Section 41-A of Cr.P.C., and emphasized that witnesses must answer questions truthfully, referencing Satendra Kumar Antil judgments that reinforce adherence to legal procedures during investigations Sanjeev @ Kallu Sethiya VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, T. Prabhakar Rao vs State of Telangana - Telangana.
-
Bail and Habeas Corpus - The Supreme Court's ruling in Satendra Kumar Antil reinforced the principle that old, ill, or vulnerable individuals (e.g., senior citizens) languishing in jail are entitled to bail, provided conditions are met, aligning with the case's directives on compassionate grounds Mohammad Azam Khan VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad.
-
Charge Sheets and Complaints - The case clarified that FIRs are initial procedural documents, and their completeness or the absence of accused names does not preclude further investigation or filing of supplementary charge sheets, as discussed in Satendra Kumar Antil judgments Ritu Chhabaria VS Union of India - Supreme Court.
-
Judicial Orders and Fairness - The rulings stress the importance of consistent, reasoned judicial orders and fairness, warning against bail based on incorrect documents and emphasizing proper judicial scrutiny, as exemplified in Satendra Kumar Antil case law Abhishek Yadav @ Laloo VS State of U. P. - Allahabad.
Analysis and Conclusion
The case of Satendra Kumar Antil has significantly influenced legal standards regarding investigation procedures, bail, and judicial fairness in India. Courts have underscored the necessity of following due process, issuing proper notices, and ensuring transparency during investigations. The judgments serve as guiding principles for safeguarding the rights of accused persons, especially vulnerable individuals, and maintaining integrity in judicial proceedings.
References:
- Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI, SCC Online SC 922 (2021) Mohammad Azam Khan VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad
- Satendra Kumar Antil vs. CBI & Anr., SCC 51 (2022) Ravendra Shukla VS State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Civil Secrtt. Govt. Lko. - Allahabad, Abhishek Yadav @ Laloo VS State of U. P. - Allahabad
- Other related judgments reinforcing procedural safeguards and investigation rights Sanjeev @ Kallu Sethiya VS State of U. P. - Allahabad, T. Prabhakar Rao vs State of Telangana - Telangana, Ritu Chhabaria VS Union of India - Supreme Court
Search Results for "Legal Documents Related to Satendra Kumar Antil"
2024 0 Supreme(All) 1111 • India - Allahabad
SAURABH LAVANIA
Case: The applicants, Ravendra Shukla and Kumari Mamta, sought to quash a charge sheet and summoning order related ... the application for quashing the charge sheet and summoning order, emphasizing the importance of honesty and full disclosure in legal ... After the aforesaid, the applicants did not appear before the Court concerned seeking benefit of the judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court passed in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil (supra) in terms of the order of this Court dated 26.08.2022 passed in the A....
• India - Crimes
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Kanhaiya Prasod, Satendra Kumar and Basuki Nath Prasad are the share-holders. ... Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40 and Para 86, 89 of the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 20. ... From the investigation, it is revealed that, sons of Radha Charan Sah, Satendra Kumar and Kanhaiya Prasad (petitioner) are designated partners in Ganinath Ventures LLP. ... Furthermore, during the course....
2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 613 • India - Patna
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
Kanhaiya Prasod, Satendra Kumar and Basuki Nath Prasad are the share-holders. ... Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2012) 1 SCC 40 and Para 86, 89 of the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 : 2022 (5) BLJ 206 (SC). ... From the investigation, it is revealed that, sons of Radha Charan Sah, Satendra Kumar and Kanhaiya Prasad (petitioner) are designated partners in Ganinath Ventures LLP. ... d....
2025 0 Supreme(All) 2282 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1998 SCC (Cri) 1400] on the ground that it related to taking of cognizance in a complaint case, the Court in Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta case [ State of Gujarat v. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta , a href="./..
2022 0 Supreme(All) 425 • India - Allahabad
RAHUL CHATURVEDI
Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Section - 8 - Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984 - Conspiracy, making forged and crafted documents ... (iii) Since the applicant is languishing in jail since 26.2.2020 and as per the ratio laid down by Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs C.B.I. reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 the applicant deserves to be bailed out in the present case too. ... The applicant is an old man of 72 years, a senior citizen, suffering from number of age related#HL_E....
2022 0 Supreme(All) 1380 • India - Allahabad
SIDDHARTH
sides by investigating officer, which he was required to do as per law, but he has again miserably failed in performance of his legal ... State of U.P. and another reported in (2018) 3 SCC 22 and recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) ... The witnesses are bound to answer the questions which are related to the case truly. Section 161 lays down the procedure for the examination of witnesses by the police. 16. ... At the s....
2025 0 Supreme(Chh) 161 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, J
He has relied upon the judgment in the matter of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. CBI. SLP No. 5191 /2021 ; Krishnan Subramanian Vs. ... He has also filed certain documents to this effect. ... The applicant was never posted in the Excise Department and has never processed any filed or dealt with any matter related to excise/liquor. ... The applicant had neither interfered in any policy matter of the Excise Department nor provided any kind of favour to any stake holder related to liquor trade i....
2025 0 Supreme(Telangana) 352 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J.SREENIVAS RAO
The record further reveals that the Investigating Officer has not issued notice under Section 41-A of the Cr.P.C., It is settled law that the said notice has to be issued to the accused directly, as per judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil v. ... He has not filed any documents in support of his contention that he is suffering with tongue cancer. The documents which are filed by the petitioner is prior to his appointment in the post of Chief of Operations (Intelligence) SIB. ... Par....
2024 0 Supreme(All) 1999 • India - Allahabad
KRISHAN PAHAL
Clear, reasoned, and consistent judicial orders are the bedrock of a trustworthy and reliable legal system. The Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. ... Antil v. ... (4) If it appears that a bail order has been passed in favour of an accused on the basis of wrong or incorrect documents, it is open to any Judge to initiate action for cancellation of bail." ... The issue of consistency in judicial proceedings is directly related to fairness and impartial procedure. The fairness of....
2023 4 Supreme 525 • India - Supreme Court
KRISHNA MURARI, C. T. RAVIKUMAR
Further, this legal position was again reiterated in Satendar Kumar Antil v. CBI & Anr. ... for a term of not less than 10 years and 60 days, as provided under Section 167(2)(a)(ii), where the investigation relates to any other offence. ... The contention of the petitioner that the accused is not named in the FIR is not a relevant submission, as the FIR is not a complete document, and is only the first step to set the criminal procedure in motion. ... The supplementary charge-sheet fil....
Filter by Legal Phrase
