IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
Niraj @ Banti Shahi – Appellant
Versus
State of UP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appreciation for amicus curiae's contributions. (Para 39) |
| 2. applications dismissed; fresh applications permitted on merits. (Para 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants in all the matters, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent, Shri Vimlendu Tripathi, learned Amicus Curiae and perused the material on record.
2. The judiciary is the bedrock of justice, and its effectiveness depends on adherence to established legal principles. However, a recurring issue plagues the High Court under 482 Cr.P.C. jurisdiction- the trial courts frequently pass summoning orders in contravention of authoritative binding judgments of Constitutional Courts. Despite consistent judgments that clarify the legal framework governing the taking of cognizance, trial courts continue to issue such orders mechanically and arbitrarily, often by inserting case details into pre- drafted or rubber-stamped templates, commonly referred to as “printed-proforma cognizance order”.
3. This issue raises serious concerns about judicial discipline, legal training and judicial accountability. It not only undermines the authority of higher Courts but also leads to unnecessary litigation, wa
Satendra Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another
Jai Prakash Verma and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Sudesh Bhadauria v. State of U.P. and others
Lalankumar Singh v. State of Maharashtra
Bhushan Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra
Pawan Kumar v. State of U.P. and others
Abdul Rasheed v. State of U.P.
Saurabh Dewana v. State of U.P.
Bhushan Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Magistrate
Bindeswari Prasad Bhardwaj v. State of U.P.
Munna Lal and others v. State of U.P. and another
Kanti Bhadra Shah v. State of West Bengal
Fakhruddin Ahmad v. State of Uttaranchal and others
Darshan Singh Ram Kishan v. State of Maharashtra
Kishun Singh and others v. State of Bihar
Chief Enforcement Officer v. Videocon International Ltd.
Fakhruddin Ahmad v. State of Uttaranchal and Another
Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda and others
Veeranna Shivalingappa Konjalgi
Kishun Singh v. State of Bihar
Jagdish Ram v. State of Rajasthan
U.P. Pollution Control Board v. Bhupendra Kumar Modi
U.P. Pollution Control Board v. Mohan Meakins Ltd.
Chief Controller of Imports & Exports v. Roshan Lal Agarwal
Jagdish Ram v. State of Rajasthan
[Mehmood Ul Rehman v. Khazir Mohammad Tunda
Pepsi Foods Ltd. v. Special Judicial Magistrate
State of Gujarat v. Afroz Mohammed Hasanfatta
Trial courts must apply judicial mind when taking cognizance under Section 190 Cr.P.C., avoiding mechanical processes, to uphold justice and prevent procedural anomalies.
Cognizance of offences - It is settled view that though Magistrate is not required to pass a detailed order when taking cognizance on chargesheet but it does not mean that order of taking cognizance ....
The summoning of an accused in a criminal case is a serious matter and the order must reflect that the Magistrate had applied his mind to the facts and the law applicable.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for judicial officers to apply judicial mind and not use printed proforma in passing judicial orders.
Point of law : A summon is a process issued by a Court calling upon a person to appear before a Magistrate - It is used for purpose of notifying an individual of his legal obligation to appearbefore ....
When information of a cognizable offence is received or such commission is suspected, proper police officer has authority to enter in investigation of same but where information relates to a non-cogn....
Judicial orders must reflect application of mind; mechanical summoning orders without reasoning are invalid.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.