KRISHAN PAHAL
Abhishek Yadav @ Laloo – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Krishan Pahal, J.
List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri. Sandeep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri. R.P. Patel, learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned AGA has stated that he does not propose to file any counter affidavit, so no question of any rejoinder affidavit arises. The matter is being heard on merits.
3. The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Abhishek Yadav, to release him on anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.138 of 2023, Under Sections 147, 323, 336, 308, 504 & 506 of I.P.C. and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station - Gopiganj, District - Bhadohi, till conclusion of trial.
Prosecution Story:
4. The FIR No. 0138 was lodged at P.S. Gopiganj, Bhadohi on 09.06.2023 at 17:33hrs with the allegations that Ishu Singh and Ritesh Yadav had an altercation in the night of 07.06.2023 which was reported by Ishu Singh at P.S. on 08.06.2023. Peeved by the said reporting, the named accused persons, Luvkush Yadav, Acchelal Yadav, Bamboo Yadav, Manish Yadav, Vijay Bahadur, Yogesh Kr. Yadav, Shiv Kr. Yadav and Some unknown persons came to the house of the informant on 09.06.2023 at about 07:30 am hurled a
Aman Preet Singh v. C.B.I. through Director
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar
Daya Shankar v. High Court of Allahabad
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Shashikant S. Patil
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Shirishkumar Rangrao Patil
High Court of Judicature at Bombay v. Udaysingh
Md. Asfak Alam v. State of Jharkhand
R.C. Chandel v. High Court of M.P.
The principle of parity in bail applications mandates that co-accused in similar circumstances should be treated alike, ensuring consistency in judicial decisions.
Anticipatory bail and regular bail applications are distinct types, requiring different procedures for posting and consideration in relation to the same crime.
The Supreme Court clarified that all bail applications arising from the same FIR must be listed before the same Judge to ensure consistency and avoid conflicting decisions.
(1) Bail – Grant or refusal to grant bail lies within discretion of court – No precedent operates in a vacuum and must be co-related to extant facts.(2) Roster – It is not for any Court, while referr....
Bail – Parity is not the sole ground on which bail can be granted – Court, while granting bail, has to consider a number of aspects – While utilizing parity as a ground for bail, same must focus on r....
(1) Disposal of bail applications – Constitutional Courts can lay down principles governing grant of bail or anticipatory bail – However, Constitutional Courts cannot interfere with discretion of our....
The considerations for grant of bail and cancellation of bail are distinct. Factors to be considered for anticipatory bail include the nature and gravity of the accusation, antecedents of the applica....
A litigant must approach the court with clean hands; suppression of material facts disqualifies them from receiving judicial relief.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.