AI Overview...
- R F a no 1564 2019 - Main points and insights:
- The case pertains to Civil Appeal Nos. 1557-1564 of 2019 decided by the Supreme Court of India on 08.02.2019, which extensively addressed the scope of review petitions and legal principles related to employment and regularization issues involving Himachal Road Transport Corporation (HRTC) employees A. Mohammed Appas vs L.S.Churchil Chinnaiah - Madras, Mohit Sharma, S/o Late Shri Subhash Chand VS Himachal Road Transport Corporation Through Its Managing Director - Himachal Pradesh, Tikkam Ram vs HRTC - Himachal Pradesh, Raj Kaur vs HRTC - Himachal Pradesh, Rubi Chakraborty vs Government Of India Press - Central Administrative Tribunal, INDHP00000033637, NEERAJ KUMAR vs HRTC AND OTHERS - Himachal Pradesh.
- The Supreme Court held that employees engaged on contractual basis should be considered for regularization from their appointment date, emphasizing that employment decisions should not be based solely on income limits or arbitrary criteria, especially in cases involving compassionate grounds Tikkam Ram vs HRTC - Himachal Pradesh, Rubi Chakraborty vs Government Of India Press - Central Administrative Tribunal, INDHP00000033637, NEERAJ KUMAR vs HRTC AND OTHERS - Himachal Pradesh.
- The judgment clarified that contractual appointments made prior to the judgment should be reviewed and regularized accordingly, and that limitations such as income criteria do not justify rejecting employment claims on compassionate grounds NEERAJ KUMAR vs HRTC AND OTHERS - Himachal Pradesh.
- Several subsequent cases and petitions (e.g., CWP No. 10763/2023, CWP No. 2107/2023) reference and rely upon this Supreme Court judgment to argue for regularization, considering similar facts and issues of contractual employment and benefits Tikkam Ram vs HRTC - Himachal Pradesh, Raj Kaur vs HRTC - Himachal Pradesh.
-
There are also references to legal challenges against orders and judgments (e.g., Criminal Case no.1564 of 2019), but these are tangential and relate to procedural aspects rather than the core employment issues addressed in the Supreme Court's decision Mamta Dilipbhai Rana VS State Of Gujarat - Gujarat.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The Supreme Court's judgment in Civil Appeal Nos. 1557-1564 of 2019 is a landmark ruling that mandates the regularization of contractual employees from their date of appointment, emphasizing fairness and legal principles over restrictive criteria such as income limits.
- The decision has a significant impact on employment practices within government and semi-government organizations like HRTC, ensuring employees engaged on contractual terms are entitled to benefits and regularization as per the Court's directives.
- Subsequent legal cases and petitions continue to invoke this judgment to support claims for regularization, arrears, and benefits, underscoring its importance in shaping employment law and administrative practices related to contractual employment in India.
References: - Central Bureau of Investigation case MANU/SC/1564/2019 - Supreme Court Judgment: Civil Appeal Nos. 1557-1564 of 2019, dated 08.02.2019 - Subsequent case references: CWP No. 10763/2023, CWP No. 2107/2023 - Related legal discussions and challenges in criminal cases and employment petitions
Search Results for "R F a no 1564 2019"
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35130 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
Central Bureau of Investigation and Others reported in MANU/SC/1564/2019. This judgement dealt with the entire length and breadth of the scope of a review petition.
2021 0 Supreme(HP) 529 • India - Himachal Pradesh
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
rendered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (c) Nos. 16158- 16165/2016) titled as Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram Etc., by issuing writ of Certiorari. ... of 2019, titled as Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram etc., decided on 08.02.2019. ... His contention is that in terms of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal Nos. 1557-1564 of 2019 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 16158-16165 ....
2023 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 7076 • India - High Court Of Chhattisgarh
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3759 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr. Manish Garg, Mr. Anindo Majumdar, JJ
Vs Tarsem Singh and Ors. (2019 9 SCC 304). ... However, the O.A. came to be filed only in 2019. till to-day, if the said record will produce before the Hon’ble Tribunal then the whole thing will crystal clear and the present applicant will get the said benefits with arrears and further directing the respondents to consider the representation dt. 30/1/2019 ... Vs Tarsem Singh and Ors. (2019 9 SCC 304) and the submissions made in the representation as already highlighted herein above. The issue of limitation should not com....
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 7655 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Pursuant to a judgment of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564/2019, titled Himachal Road Transport CCorporation Versus Lekh Ram and others, dated 08.02.2019, the case of similarly placed employees was directed to be considered for regularization from the date of their appointment hon contract ... of 2019 decided on 08.02.2019 4 CWP No. 10763/2023 decided on 05.04.2024 installments in light ... grievance is against the part of aforesaid order whereby respondents have restricted the payment of af....
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 7958 • India - IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
Pursuant too a judgment of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564/2019, titled Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram and others, dated 08.02.2019, the case of similarly placed employees was directed to be considered for regularization from the date of their appointment on contract ... , [CWP No. 2107/2023 decided on 31.05.2023] in support of his submission that 2 Civil Appeal Nos. 1557-1564 of 2019 decided on 08.02.2019
2021 0 Supreme(HP) 63 • India - Himachal Pradesh
SURESHWAR THAKUR, SANDEEP SHARMA
The afore unfolding(s), occurring in the appointment letter, issued to the petitioner by the respondents, does violate, the principles of law expostulated, in a verdict rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 1557 to 1564 of 2019, titled as Himachal Road Transport Corporation vs.
2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 1286 • India - High Court of Himachal Pradesh
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J
, [2Civil Appeal Nos.1557-1564/2019 decided on 08.02.2019] income limit was not considered as valid criteria for considering the cases seeking employment on compassionate ground, hence petitioner’s case for compassionate employment could not be rejected on count of his family
2023 0 Supreme(HP) 562 • India - Himachal Pradesh
RANJAN SHARMA
of 2019, titled as Himachal Road Transport Corporation Versus Lekh Ram etc. etc., decided on 08.02.2019, Annexure P-4. ... grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is entitled for regular appointment w.e.f. 08.08.2008 (instead of 09.07.2015, but was wrongly given contractual appointment on 08.08.2008), in view of the judgment passed by this Court against which the Respondent-Corporation has filed Civil Appeal No.1557-1564
2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1644 • India - Gujarat
GITA GOPI
Hence, the impugned judgment and order dated 27.6.2022 passed by the learned JMFC, Vadodara in Criminal Case no.1564 of 2019 is quashed and set aside and is ordered to be restored on the file of the concerned Judge from the stage of cross-examination of the complainant. ... Vedant Gaikwad, learned advocate for the appellant states that the appellant– original complainant of Criminal Case no.1564 of 2019 has challenged the judgment and order dated 27.6.2022 passed by the learned JMFC, Vadodara while dismissing the complai....
Filter by Legal Phrase
