Key Points:- The park’s transformation into underground shopping and parking was held to violate statutory duties and public trust, requiring demolition and restoration of the park. (!) (!) (!) - The High Power Committee’s formation and its actions violated relevant sections (delegation under Section 119, contract execution under Section 133, and other procedural norms), rendering the agreement with the builder invalid. (!) (!) (!) (!) - The Mahapalika’s obligations under Section 114 include maintenance of parks and construction/maintenance of parking; construction of underground parking without proper study and due process breached these duties. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The transaction was found to be a disposal of property contrary to Sections 128 and 129, with the park being held in public trust; hence the agreement was void and not binding on the Mahapalika. (!) (!) (!) - The Court directed dismantling of Blocks 1, 2, and 4 and conversion of Block 3 into parking, with park restoration to be completed within 12 months. (!) (!) - The decision emphasizes that governance must adhere to statutory mandates and that public-interest considerations do not justify illegality or improper disposal of public land. (!) (!) (!) - The doctrine of public trust applies to the park, reinforcing that public properties like parks must be preserved for citizens. (!) (!) (!) - The case discusses the principles of judicial review, including ensuring actions are within the law, proper procedure, and reasonableness. (!) (!) (!) - The Master Plan and Development Act constraints limited the use of park land; master plan disapproved commercial exploitation of park land. (!) (!) (!) (!)

What is the standard for judicial review of administrative actions in this case?What is the legality of the park’s disposal and the underground complex in light of the UP Nagar Mahapalika Adhiniyam provisions?What are the consequences and remedies prescribed by the court for unauthorised construction and mismanagement of public property?