SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 892

AJAY RASTOGI, B. V. NAGARATHNA
R. Abirami – Appellant
Versus
D. Santhanam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s):Petitioner-in-person (NP)
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anish R. Shah, AOR Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr. Adv./AAG Dr. Joseph Aristotle S., AOR Ms. Nupur Sharma, Adv. Mr. Shobhit Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahara, Adv. Ms. Richa Vishwakarma, Adv.

ORDER :

1. The present petition has been filed at the instance of the complainant-victim assailing the order dated 20th September, 2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras quashing the FIR in Crime No. 07 of 2021 dated 6th May, 2021 and the criminal proceedings in exercise of its power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. We have heard the petitioner-in-person and learned counsel for the respondents for quite some time.

3. After taking into consideration the submissions made by the parties as well as the written submissions furnished by the petitioner-in-person at the time of arguments and on perusal of record, we find no reason to interfere.

4. Consequently, the special leave petition is dismissed. No costs.

5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top