P. Varavara Rao vs National Investigation Agency

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 1556

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
P. Varavara Rao – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Anand Grover, Sr. Advocate, Ms. Nupur Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Paras Nath Singh, Advocate, Mr. Neeraj Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Susan Abraham, Advocate, Mr. R. Satyanarayan, Advocate, Ms. Nilima Dutta, Advocate, Mr. Aditya Chitale, Advocate, For the Appellant / Mr. S.V. Raju, ASG, Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Advocate, Ms. Swati Ghildiyal, Advocate, Ms. Sairica Raju, Advocate, Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Advocate, Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, For the Respondent.

ORDER

1. Considering the nature of the controversy involved in the matter, it is put to the learned counsel for the parties that the matter shall be disposed of on the next occasion.

2. Since we have not issued any formal notice till this date, notice is hereby issued, returnable on 10.08.2022.

3. As Mr. S.V. Raju, learned Additional Solicitor General is appearing in the matter, the actual service of notice is dispensed with.

4. A compilation has been placed on record by learned Additional Solicitor General. In case any other paper(s)/material is/are to be placed on record, the same shall be filed on or before 02.08.2022.

5. Rejoinder, if any, be filed on or before 08.08.2022.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2022 Supreme(SC) 1556

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIAP. Varavara Rao – AppellantVersusNational Investigation Agency – Respondent

UDAY UMESH LALIT, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
P. Varavara Rao – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent