SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Tri) 16

ARINDAM LODH
Mandira Das – Appellant
Versus
Tripura University – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S S Debnath, Advocate, D. Singh Kunwar, Advocate, Tanmay Debbarma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. S. S. Debnath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Tanmay Debbarma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. Let a notice be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why a rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or as to why such further order/s should not be passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.

3. Notice is made returnable within 6(six) weeks.

4. Since all the respondents have already entered their appearance, no formal notice is called for.

5. List the matter on 23.02.2023. In the meantime, the respondents may file their counter affidavits, if they so desire.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top