SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 1702

SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, ABHAY S. OKA
Naresh Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Villivalam Raghavchari Sridhar – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee, Advocate, Mr. Anjan Datta, Advocate, Mr. Syed N. A., Advocate, Mr. Binod Kumar Behera, Advocate, Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, Ms. Garima G. Mukherjee, Advocate, Mr. Rajasmit Mondal, Advocate, Mr. Ujjwal Bhardwaj, Advocate, Ms. Ritu Rajkumari, Advocate, Mr. Robin Khokhar, Advocate, For the Appellant.

ORDER

1. On hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we are not inclined to interfere under Article 136 of the Constitution of India in the given facts of the case.

2. The special leave petition is dismissed.

3. However, we must note with some consideration that the FIR was registered in the year 1990 and 32 years hence the trial is not complete.

4. We direct the Trial Court to proceed with the trial on almost day to day basis and ensure that the trial is completed within a maximum period of six months from the date of communication of the this order.

5. Pending applications stand disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top