BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Shashi Bhushan Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, J.
1. Leave Granted.
2. The present batch of appeals arise out of judgement dated 16.02.2023, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3411/2022 (‘CWJC’) along with other connected matters (the ‘Impugned Order’), whereby the Writ Petitioners who were the unsuccessful candidates in the Recruitment Process conducted pursuant to the Advertisement dated 08.03.2019 for the post of Junior Engineer (Civil), had challenged the vires of Rule 9(1)(ii) of the Bihar Water Resources Department Subordinate Engineering (Civil) Cadre Recruitment (Amendment) Rules 2017, published vide notification dated 07.11.2017, prescribing technical qualification eligibility for selection/appointment to the technical post in the State of Bihar. The appellants before this Court are the successful candidates in the said Recruitment Process.
3. The present matter begins with the issuance of Advertisement No. 01/2019 dated 08.03.2019 by the Bihar Technical Service Commission (‘BTSC’) inviting applications for 6,379 vacancies to the post of Junior Engineer across various state departments (the ‘Advertisement’). The Advertisement specified that
Bharathidasan University & Anr. vs. AICTE & Ors. 2001 (8) SCC 676 – Relied [Para 5]
Punjab National Bank vs. Anit Kumar Das (2021) 12 SCC 80 – Referred [Para 13]
The Chairman SBI & Anr. vs. M.J. James (2022) 2 SCC 301 – Referred [Para 13]
K. Manjusree vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. (2008) 3 SCC 512 – Relied [Para 14]
Important Point – Appointment – Introducing new requirements into selection process after entire selection process was completed amounted to changing rules of game after game was played which is not ....
(1) Appointment – Even if relevant rules permit competent authority to set benchmarks at different stages of recruitment process, same must be done at any time before relevant stage is reached.(2) Ap....
Candidates do not have a vested right to insist on the completion of a recruitment process if it is cancelled based on valid reasons, including changes in qualifications and reservation policies.
Eligibility criteria for recruitment cannot be altered mid-process, as it undermines fairness and transparency, violating established legal principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.