Back
ABHAY S. OKA, UJJAL BHUYAN
Nisar Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Sami Ullah (Dead) through LRs. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The two appeals by special leave are directed against the judgment and order dated 05.01.2009 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6635 of 1974 (Nisar Ahmad and Others vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sultanpur and Others) and in Writ Petition No. 18 of 1975 (Sami Ullah and Another vs. Nisar Ahmed and Others). By the aforesaid judgment and order dated 05.01.2009, Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 6635 of 1974 was dismissed and Writ Petition No. 18 of 1975 has been allowed.
3. By order dated 27.04.2009, this Court had issued notice on the special leave petition as well as on the prayer for interim relief. Subsequently, by order dated 15.01.2010, both the parties were directed to maintain status quo prevailing as on 15.01.2010. Thereafter, by order dated 03.11.2011, leave was granted directing the status quo order to be continued in the meantime.
4. At the outset, it may be useful to make a brief reference to the relevant facts. Zahoor Ahmed, so
Land consolidation – Determination of share of parties – Authorities cannot import principles of Hindu law while determining share of parties who are Mohammedans.
The Revisional Authority must provide sound reasoning when reversing lower court findings; mere admissions without corroborating evidence are insufficient to establish claims of ownership.
Legal proceedings initiated after the issuance of consolidation notifications are invalid under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, as outlined in Section 5(2), and proper filing o....
The U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act allows authorities to adjudicate on land rights even when a wrong provision is cited, as long as they possess the necessary jurisdiction.
A party must file timely objections under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, or claims related to land within the consolidation scheme are deemed invalid, and previous orders cannot be ....
Tenure Land - Once a dispute was recorded by Assistant Consolidation Officer and on objection being filed same was referred to Consolidation Officer, it is incumbent to Consolidation Officer to decid....
Point of law: opinion Section 8 is not attracted in the case of leases of land where the purposes of the leases is to use the land for the purpose of agriculture, horticulture, pisciculture etc. It i....
The court ruled that title objections under the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act must be decided on merit, emphasizing the need for proper jurisdiction and evidence rather than relying on alleged c....
Consolidation authorities must adhere to statutory provisions when allotting chaks, ensuring tenure holders receive compact areas near their largest holdings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
