Bank Can Adjust OTS Deposit on Borrower Default, No Cheating u/s 420 IPC: Delhi High Court
02 Mar 2026
Divij Kumar Quits CMS INDUSLAW for Independent Practice
03 Mar 2026
Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
BELA M. TRIVEDI, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
Ishwar Chanda Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Devendra Kumar Sharma – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
JUDGMENT :
Satish Chandra Sharma, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appeal before us has been preferred by the Appellant against the final judgement and order dated 27.08.2024 in Contempt Application (C) No. 4429 of 2023 (hereinafter "Impugned Order”) passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (hereinafter “High Court”), whereby the High Court allowed the petition preferred by Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2, and set aside order dated 28.03.2023 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Mathura/Respondent No. 3 (hereinafter “Trial Court”), and remanded the matter back for fresh consideration.
3. During the course of the hearing, this Court has allowed I.A. No. 15019/2025, being an appl
The court underscored the principle that appointments of receivers in temple management should prioritize individuals with religious and administrative expertise over legal professionals to ensure ef....
The court established that the Commissioner of Endowments lacked jurisdiction to revoke exemptions and appoint trustees without following due process as mandated by the Endowments Act.
The Supreme Court established guidelines for the proper management and regulation of religious properties, emphasizing public interest and accountability of involved parties.
The appointment of non-hereditary trustees is valid under the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act when there is evidence of mismanagement by hereditary trustees, and full legal procedures a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for relief sought in writ petitions to be within the scope of the general direction contained in the order of the Apex Court dated ....
The distinction between a private and a public endowment is that whereas in the former the beneficiaries are specific individuals, in the latter they are the general public or a class thereof.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article