DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN
Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
DIPANKAR DATTA, J.
| INDEX | |
| I. INTRODUCTION | |
| II. ORDERS PASSED BY THE RESPECTIVE HIGH COURTS, IMPUGNED IN THE APPEALS | |
| IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN THE LEAD APPEAL BEING Civil Appeal No. 1385 OF 2025 AND Civil Appeal No. 1386 OF 2025 | |
| IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal Nos. 6365 - 6367 OF 2025 | |
| IMPUGNED ORDER IN Civil Appeal Nos. 1364 - 1367 OF 2025 | |
| IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal Nos. 1389, 1390, 1391, 1393, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1401, 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410 OF 2025 | |
| IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal No. 6364 OF 2025 | |
| SUMMARY OF THE JUDGMENTS | |
| III. PREVIOUS DECISIONS CONCERNING THE RTE ACT | |
| SOCIETY FOR UNAIDED PRIVATE SCHOOLS OF RAJASTHAN | |
| Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India | |
| IV. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES | |
| V. THE ACTS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS | |
| VI. ANALYSIS AND REASONS | |
| A. FROM PROMISE TO RIGHT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL JOURNEY OF ARTICLE 21A AND THE RIGHT TO ELEMENTARY EDUCATION IN INDIA | |
| B. BREATHING LIFE INTO THE PROMISE: THE RTE ACT AND THE REALISATION OF ARTICLE 21A | |
| C. THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOAL OF UNIVE | |
Society for Unaided Private Schools of Rajasthan v. Union of India
T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka
P.A. Inamdar v. State of Maharashtra
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India
State of Kerala v. N.M. Thomas
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Secy., Malankara Syrian Catholic College v. T. Jose
Brahmo Samaj Education Society & Ors. v. State of West Bengal
Sindhi Education Society v. Chief Secretary Govt. of Delhi
Chandana Das (Malkar) v. State of West Bengal
Committee of Management, Vasanta College for Women v. Tribhuwan Nath Tripathi
Food Corpn. of India v. Bhanu Lodh
Hardev Singh v. Union of India
J. Ranga Swamy v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh
Union of India v. Krishna Kumar
Zee Telefilms v Union of India
B. Shama Rao v. Union Territory of Pondicherry
State of Orissa v. Sudhanshu Sekhar Misra
Dalbir Singh v. State of Punjab
State of UP v. Synthetics & Chemicals Ltd.
Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia v. Union of India
Christian Medical College Vellore Assn. v. Union of India
Mohini Jain v. State of Karnataka
Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
Rev. Sidhrajbhai Sabhai vs. State of Gujarat
N.M. Nageshwaramma v. State of A.P.
Andhra Kesari Educational Society v. Director of School Education
State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Sahebrao Roundale
Chandigarh Administration. v. Rajni Vali (Mrs.)
State of Orissa v. Mamata Mohanty
Bhartiya Seva Samaj Trust v. Yogeshbhai Ambalal Patel
M. Ramachandran v. Govind Ballabh
K. Narayanan v. State of Karnataka
Arvind Kumar Shukla v. Union of India
Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal
The court ruled that TET qualification is mandatory for promotions in educational institutions, including minority schools, affirming the government's authority to prescribe such qualifications.
The Amendment Rules exempting private unaided schools from admitting 25% disadvantaged children based on proximity to government schools violate the RTE Act and Article 21-A, as they impose condition....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the right of a religious minority to administer an educational institution of its choice, including the appointment of a Headmaster, is of....
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act mandates that private unaided schools comply with all provisions of the Act, including maintaining educational standards and ensuring opport....
The State cannot compel minority institutions to share seats; it must ensure transparent, merit-based admissions without compromising minority character.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.