SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 1293

DIPANKAR DATTA, MANMOHAN
Anjuman Ishaat-E-Taleem Trust – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. D. Kumanan, AOR Mr. Amol Chitale, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Adv. Mrs. Pragya Baghel, AOR Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Wilson, Sr. Adv. Mr. M. P. Parthiban, AOR Mr. Shankaran, Sr. Adv. Mr. Apoorv Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Lokesh Krishna, Adv. M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR Mr. Ans Nadkarni, Sr. Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Ms. Nivedita Nair, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Mr. K.radhakrishnan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sabarish Subramanian, AOR Ms. Jahnavi Taneja, Adv. Mr. C. Kranthi Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Unnikrishnan, Adv. Mr. Riddi Bose, Adv. Ms. Racheeta Chawla, Adv. Ms. Sampriti Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Danish Saifi, Adv. Ms. Rishi Agarwal, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. A. S. Rajnarayan, Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh, AOR Mr. Krishan Kant Kumar, Adv. Mr. R Venkataramani, Attorney General for India Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Sudarshan Lamba, AOR Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv. Ms. Satvika Thakur, Adv. Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Mr. Kartikay Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Ameya Vikrma Thanvi, Adv. Mr./Ms. Oorjaswi Goswani, Adv. Mr. Gopal Sankarnarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR Mr. Vishal Sinha, Adv. Mr. Tushar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shashibhushan P. Adgaonkar, Adv. Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv. Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR Ms. Manisha T Karia, Sr. Adv. Ms. Shalini Chandra, AOR Mr. Deepin Deepak Sahni, Adv. Ms. Ananya Arora, Adv. Ms. Shreya Gupta, Adv. Ms. Asha Gopalan Nair, AOR Mr. Abdulrahiman Tamboli, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi, AOR Mrs. N. Kavitha Rameshwar, Adv. Mr. A. Rajarajan, Adv. Mrs. L. Vasuki Rajarajan, Adv. Mr. R. Ramachandran, Adv. Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR Mr. Mohd Parvez Dabas, Adv. Mr. Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv. Mr. Syed Mehdi Imam, AOR Mr. Vinamra Kopariha, Adv. Mr. Yash S. Vijay, AOR Mr. K Parameshwar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Dubey, AOR Mr. T. Bhaskar Gowtham, Adv. Ms. Shuchi Singh, Adv. Mr. Vivek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Shivani Mishra, Adv. Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Adv. Mr. Aditya Kashyap, Adv. Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,, Adv. Mr. Ayush Anand, AOR Mr. Sai Shashank V,, Adv. Mr. Praneet Pranav, Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Gautam, Adv. Dr. G Babu, Adv. Mr. Mugundhan, Adv. Mr. Monu Kumar, Adv. Dr. Vinod Kumar Tewari, AOR Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. Bhoopesh Pandey, Adv. Mr. Jitesh Sharma, Adv. Ms. Saumya Mishra, Adv. Mr. Bharat Bhushan Mishra, Adv. Ms. Nidhi Jain, Adv. Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AOR Ms. Deepika Kalia, Adv. Ms. Vasudha Singh, Adv. Ms. Vaishnavi, Adv. Ms. Madhumeet Kaur, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Chandra, Adv. Mr. Pratyaksh Semwal, Adv. Mr. Mohnish Nirwan, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Umesh Dubey, AOR Ms. N. Kavitha Rameshwar, Adv. Mr. A. Rajarajan, Adv. Ms. L. Vasuki Rajarajan, Adv. Mr. R. Ramchandran, Adv. Mr. Parth Sarathi, Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Vikram Singh, Adv. Ms. Soumya Gulati, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Mrs. Shantha Devi Raman, Adv. Mr. Garvesh Kabra, AOR Mr. Parth Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Arihant Jain, Adv. Ms. Tanisha Gopal, Adv. Mr. Sameer Shrivastava, AOR Mr. Palak Mathur, Adv. Ms. Yashika Varshney, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

DIPANKAR DATTA, J.

INDEX

I. INTRODUCTION

II. ORDERS PASSED BY THE RESPECTIVE HIGH COURTS, IMPUGNED IN THE APPEALS

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN THE LEAD APPEAL BEING Civil Appeal No. 1385 OF 2025 AND Civil Appeal No. 1386 OF 2025

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal Nos. 6365 - 6367 OF 2025

IMPUGNED ORDER IN Civil Appeal Nos. 1364 - 1367 OF 2025

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal Nos. 1389, 1390, 1391, 1393, 1395, 1396, 1397, 1398, 1399, 1401, 1403, 1404, 1405, 1406, 1407, 1408, 1409, 1410 OF 2025

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IN Civil Appeal No. 6364 OF 2025

SUMMARY OF THE JUDGMENTS

III. PREVIOUS DECISIONS CONCERNING THE RTE ACT

SOCIETY FOR UNAIDED PRIVATE SCHOOLS OF RAJASTHAN

Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v. Union of India

IV. ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES

V. THE ACTS, RULES, REGULATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS

VI. ANALYSIS AND REASONS

A. FROM PROMISE TO RIGHT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL JOURNEY OF ARTICLE 21A AND THE RIGHT TO ELEMENTARY EDUCATION IN INDIA

B. BREATHING LIFE INTO THE PROMISE: THE RTE ACT AND THE REALISATION OF ARTICLE 21A

C. THE CONSTITUTIONAL GOAL OF UNIVE

                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                            1
                                            2
                                            3
                                            4
                                            5
                                            6
                                            7
                                            8
                                            9
                                            10
                                            11
                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                            supreme today icon
                                            logo-black

                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                            qr

                                            Scan Me!

                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                            whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top