C.Y.SOMAYAJULU
Kurella Naga Druva Vudaya Bhaskara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Galla Janikamma @ Macharamma – Respondent
Defendant in a suit for recovery of possession of Acs.3-90 cents in Survey NO.100 of Rajanagaram of Rajahmundry, which hereinafter would be referred to as 'the suit land', is the appellant.
2. The case, in brief, of the respondent is that, as the appellant and her husband are closely related, she, at the instance of the appellant, had purchased the suit land under EX.A-1 registered sale deed from its owner and paid the consideration payable by her to her vendor through her husband and her brother and was put in possession thereof and later she entrusted the management of the suit land to the appellant as he promised to manage the same on her behalf. Appellant, who was sending the rentals from the suit land and was paying taxes for some years, informed her in 1971 that inasmuch as leasing out the suit land to tenants may create problems in future, he himself would cultivate the same and pay 40 bags of paddy per annum to her and started cultivating the same till the end of 1977. Later, as differences cropped up between him and her husband in connection with the settlement deed executed by Smt. Mahalakshmamma and her husband Veeraraju, appellant stopped paying rent. So, she got
M.CHITTI SANYASI PRASAD RAO Vs RUNKU LAKSHMAYYA
VECHALAPU RAMULU (DIED) Vs VECHALAPU APPALANAIDU
Ragu Raghava Rao Vs Tenancy Tahsildar, Respondents in Tanuku, W.G.Dist.
Boppudi Viswanadham Vs Lakshminarasimhaswamyvaru temple, Kommaravallipadu by Executive Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.