IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI, JJ.
Dr. M. Vasurchana Reddy and Others – Petitioners
Versus
State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary – Respondent
Writ Petition Nos. 9829, 10017, 10114, 10194, 10230, 10461, 10687, 10903 of 2018
Decided On : 09-04-2018
Writ Petition - A.P. Reorganization Act, 2014 - Section 95 - A.P. Educational Institutions Act 1983 - Section 3 read with Section 15(1) - Education - Writ Petitions, is to declare Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department in so far as Rules 4 and 7 thereof are concerned, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Reorganization Act, to declare Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department - Held, In terms of Regulation 9(VII) of the 2000 MCI Regulations, the petitioners shall be entitled for reservation in the 50% State quota seats in Post-graduate diploma courses provided they have rendered a minimum period of at least three years’ service in tribal areas - As stipulated in Regulation 9(VII) of the 2000 MCI Regulations, Government doctors, who are admitted to the seats reserved in their favour in Post-graduate medical diploma courses, shall serve for two more years in tribal areas on completion of their P.G. medical diploma course - Second limb of Rule 5(v) of the 2017 Rules, as amended by to the extent it relates to candidates, who did their Post-graduate diploma course before joining Government service, is struck down as irrational and ultra-vires Article 14 of the Constitution of India - Consequently Government doctors, who have completed their Post-graduate diploma courses before they joined Government service, shall be entitled for deputation for a period of three years in terms of Rule 5(1) and (2) while undergoing Post-graduate medical degree courses - Petition disposed of. (Paras 5, 6, 7)
1. The relief, sought for in these Writ Petitions, is to declare G.O.Ms. No. 21, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department dated 20.03.2018, in so far as Rules 4 and 7 thereof are concerned, as illegal and arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Reorganization Act, 2014, to declare G.O.Ms. No. 22, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (C1) Department, dated 20.03.2018, in so far as 50% of the Post Graduate seats in Government Medical colleges have been earmarked to the All India quota, as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to Section 95 of the A.P. Reorganization Act, 2014 and to, consequently, set aside the G.Os. and direct the respondents to make admissions to MD/ MS/PG Degree/Diploma courses, 2018 in terms of G.O.Ms. No. 260 dated 10.07.1997 and G.O.Ms. No. 27 dated 10.04.2017.
2. The petitioners are all doctors who have either passed their MBBS course or their Post-graduate diploma course. They are employed by the State Government. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 read with Section 15(1) of the A.P. Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act 1983 (hereinafter called the 1983 Act) and in super-session of the rules in force governing admission into post graduation courses, the Governor of Andhra Pradesh made the Andhra Pradesh Medical Colleges Admission into Post Graduate Medical Courses) Rules, 1997 (the 1997 Rules for short) which were notified in G.O.Ms. No. 260, Health, Medical and Family Welfare (E2), dated 10.07.1997. Rule 3 thereof related to reservations and, under sub-rule (2) thereof, 15% of the seats in clinical subjects i.e. in Medicine, Surgery, Obstetrics & Gynaecology Groups and 30% of the seats in non-clinical subjects in each group for Degree and Diploma courses separately, were reserved for in-service candidates in each category under the service quota. Candidates selected on merit, in the respective categories, were to be counted against the service quota; and the service rendered was to be calculated as per the date specified by the University of Health Sciences.
Explanation - 1 of Rule 3(2) of the 1997 Rules clarified that in-service candidates had to put in (a) two years of continuous regular tribal service, (b) three years of continuous regular rural service; or (c) six years of continuous regular service to be eligible to be considered under the in-service category.
Explanation - 2 defined Tribal Service, Rural Service and Continuous regular service.
3. G.O.Ms. No. 27, Health, Medical & Family Welfare (C1) Department dated 10.04.2017 was issued notifying the Telangana Medical Colleges (Admission into Post Graduate Medical Courses) Rules, 2017 (for short the 2017 Rules). The 2017 Rules were made in the exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 read with Section 15(1) of the Telangana Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Prohibition of Capitation Fee) Act, 1983 (the 1983 Act for short) and in supersession of the earlier rules regarding preparation of seat matrtix and the selection procedure for admission into PG broad speciality in the competent authority quota. Rule 3(II) of the said Rules related to reservation and, under clause (b) thereunder, 30% of the seats in clinical broad specialities and 50% of the seats in pre and para-clinical broad specialities, for Degree and Diploma broad specialities separately, were reserved for in-service candidates, under the service quota, which were horizontal reservations. Reservation to SC, ST and BC category candidates was to be followed in clinical and non-clinical broad specialities. The principle of reservation and merit was required to be followed among the in-service candidates for admission into these courses. Candidates selected on merit, in the respective categories, were however to be counted against the in-service quota and the service rendered by them was to be calculated as per the dates specified by the KNR University of Health Sciences. Rule 4 presc
Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd vs. State of Assam
Ajay Kumar Bhuyan vs. State of Orissa
A. Ranganath vs. Andhra University, Visakhapatnam
B. Meenakshi vs. Government of A.P. (1995) 4 SCC 104
Behram Khurshid Pesikaka vs. State of Bombay
B. Ramesh vs. University of Health Sciences
Bayer India Ltd. vs. State of Maharashtra
CIT vs. East West Import and Export (P) Ltd. (1995) 3 SCC 17
CCE vs. Dunlop India Ltd. (2001) 2 SCC 186
B.R. Enterprises vs. State of U.P. AIR 1956 SC 35 : (1955) 2 SCR 842
Director of Settlements A.P. vs. M.R. Apparao
D. Navinchandra & Co. vs. Union of India
Dr. C. Surekha vs. Union of India
Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd. vs. Prem Heavy Engg. Works (P) Ltd. (2003) 1 SCC 707
Devarakonda Rajesh Babu vs. NIMS
Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Bajrangi Rabidas
Fazal Gafoor vs. Union of India
Government of A.P. vs. P. Vema Reddy
Govt. of A.P. vs. A. Suryanarayana Rao
Hombe Gowda Educational Trust vs. State of Karnataka
In Re: Powers, Privileges and Immunities of State Legislatures
J&K Public Service Commission vs. Dr. Narinder Mohan
Kausalya Devi Bogra vs. Land Acquisition Officer
Member, Board of Revenue vs. Arthur Paul Benthall
M.S.L. Patil, Asstt. Conservator of Forests, Solarpur vs. State of Maharashtra
Narinder Chand Hem Raj vs. Lt. Governor & Administrator
Narinder Singh vs. Surjit Singh
P. Mahendran v. State of Karnataka
Preeti Srivastava vs. State of M.P. (1992) 2 SCC 26
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Hansrajbhai V. Kodala
Ritesh Tewari vs. State of U.P. (2014) 13 SCC 681
Rashpal Malhotra vs. Mrs. Saya Rajput
Tej Prakash Pathak vs. Rajasthan High Court
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Dinesh Singh Chauhan
State of T.N. vs. Adhiyaman Educational & Research Institute
State of Orissa vs. Dhaniram Luhar
State of Bihar vs. Ramdeo Yadav
Sangram Singh vs. Election Tribunal, Kotah
State of Maharashtra vs. Prabhu
Secy. ONGC Ltd. vs. V.U. Warrier
Snehelata Patnaik vs. State of Orissa
Master Marine Services Pvt. Ltd vs. Metcalfe and Hodgkinson Pvt. Ltd. (2000) 2 SCC 617
Santosh Kumar Verma vs. State of Bihar
Spencer & Co. Ltd. vs. Vishwadarshan Distributors (P) Ltd. (1993) 3 SCC 29
Union of India vs. Kantilal Hematram Pandya
University of Allahabad vs. Dr. Anand Prakash Mishra
Veerappa Pillai vs. Raman & Raman Ltd. (2010) 10 SCC 677 : (2010) 4 SCC (Civ) 315
gpt-4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.