D. V. S. S. SOMAYAJULU
Mukkamala Estates Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar, Irahimpatnam, Krishna District – Respondent
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following reliefs:
ii) Further to declare that land in an extent of Acres 111.03 cents covered by R.S.No.86 situated in Navi Pothavaram village in Ibrahimpatnam Mandalam in Krishna District not having been notified as forest land in terms of Section 4 of the A.P. Forest Act, cannot be declared as Forest area, and accordingly, interdict the respondents from interfering with possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the said extent of land and;
iii) To declare the order of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Hyderabad, i.e., the 4th respondent herein, issued in Rc.No.3495/2009-J1, dt.16.03.2009, as illegal, void, inoperative and set aside the s
Godrej and Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited and Another v State of Maharashtra and Others
Madhya Pradesh Housing Board v Mohd Shafi
Pollisetti Pullamma v Kalluri Kameswaramma
Rani Sundarammani v Government of Andhra Pradesh and Others
Santoshkumar Shivgonda Patil v. Balasaheb Tukaram Shevale (2009) 9 SCC 352 : (2009) 3 SCC (Civ) 749]
The court reaffirmed that the notification under the Indian Forest Act validly vested land with the State, and the appellate authority exceeded its jurisdiction by setting aside unchallenged notifica....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the lack of jurisdiction of Consolidation Authorities over forest land notified under Section-4 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the vesting of ....
The court upheld the principle that claims to ownership over lands designated as reserved forest cannot be established without following lawful de-reservation processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the probative value of the Gazette Notification under the Forest Act and the implications of the bar on entertaining suits during the notification ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the power of the State Government to reserve forest land or wasteland under Section 3 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927, and the consequences of vesti....
(1) Title – Revenue Record is not a document of title and does not confer any ownership or title upon person whose name appears in it – Mutation does not create or extinguish title and has absolutely....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the reiteration of the legal principles established in the case of Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.