Back
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Battu Devanand, J.
Chirumamilla Srinivasu – Appellant
Versus
Gopala Krishna Diwedi, I.A.S & Ors. – Respondents
Contempt Case No. 4821 of 2022
Decided On : 27-01-2023
Contempt - Implementation of Court Order - The court found that the respondents had implemented the court order by making payment to the petitioner, leading to the closure of the contempt case. The petitioner was granted liberty to raise further rights after the disposal of related writ appeals.
Fact of the Case:
The Contempt Case was filed alleging wilful disobedience by the respondents in implementing the court order dated 24.08.2022 in W.P.No.23442 of 2022.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the respondents had implemented the court order by making payment to the petitioner, and therefore, it was not necessary to continue the Contempt Case further. The case was closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to raise further rights after the disposal of related writ appeals.
Issues: Wilful disobedience in implementing the court order, closure of the Contempt Case, granting liberty to the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The implementation of the court order by making payment to the petitioner led to the closure of the Contempt Case, and the petitioner was granted liberty to raise further rights after the disposal of related writ appeals.
Final Decision: The Contempt Case was closed, granting liberty to the petitioner to renew/raise/agitate his right with regard to interest aspect, etc., after disposal of the Writ Appeal Nos.740 and 741 of 2021. No order as to costs was made.
JUDGMENT
Battu Devanand, J. - This Contempt Case has been filed complaining wilful disobedience on the part of the respondents in implementing the Order dated 24.08.2022 in W.P.No.23442 of 2022 in true spirit.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order of this Court is implemented by making payment to the petitioner on 28-12-2022.
4. In view of the above, in our view, it is not necessary to continue this Contempt Case further.
5. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to renew/raise/agitate his right with regard to interest aspect, etc., after disposal of the Writ Appeal Nos.740 and 741 of 2021.
6. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
The implementation of the court order by the respondents led to the closure of the Contempt Case, and the petitioner was granted liberty to raise further rights after the disposal of related writ app....
Compliance with court orders is crucial in contempt cases.
Compliance with court orders can lead to the closure of contempt proceedings.
Compliance with the court's order can lead to the closure of Contempt Proceedings.
Compliance with court orders can lead to the closure of contempt proceedings.
Acceptance of unconditional apology for delay in implementing court order
Contempt closed upon claimed compliance, liberty given to challenge order's adequacy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
