Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
S. R. Thyagarajan S/o Late Ranganandam – Appellant
Versus
District Forest Officer Chittoor East Division – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
V.Gopala Krishna Rao, J.
1. When the matter was listed on 01.02.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant and the matter was posted to 05.02.2024, under the caption “For Dismissal”.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants, it seems that the appellants are no inclined to prosecute the appeal.
3. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Dismissal for non-prosecution when there is no representation on both sides
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal
Non-prosecution of the appeal led to its dismissal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Non-appearance and lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal can lead to dismissal of the suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
