Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
B. KRISHNA MOHAN
Mullapudi Yamini Pushkarini – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land acquisition for public purpose. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding public purpose and deceit in acquisition process. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. procedures and provisions of nh act relevant to the case. (Para 8 , 12) |
| 4. public interest vs private interest in land acquisition. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 19) |
| 5. conclusion on validity of acquisition proceedings. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
ORDER :
1. The land owners, whose lands have come under acquisition for construction of a four-lane access-controlled Greenfield Highway by National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) from Khammam-Devarapalli are before this Court.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. The present petition is filed challenging the Notifications, Award Enquiry Notices, Award, Award Notices issued under the National Highways Act, 1956, EIA Notification, 2006 viz., (i) SO.No. 1388 (E) published in Gazette No.1240 dated 27.04.2020 and under section 3A of the NH Act, 1956 published in Hans India, Andhra Jyothi daily News Papers dated 08.05.2020 (ii) S.O.No.4189(E), MORT & H dated 23.11.2020 published in Gazette No.3687 under section 3D of the NH Act, (iii) Pu
The court affirmed that the declaration of a road as a national highway is not a prerequisite for land acquisition under the National Highways Act, emphasizing public interest in infrastructure devel....
The court upheld the validity of land acquisition proceedings under the National Highways Act, confirming the necessity of adherence to statutory requirements while emphasizing the priority of public....
The court held that the National Highways Authority of India can acquire land for road safety advocacy as it falls within its statutory functions under the National Highways Act.
Compliance with publication and hearing requirements of the National Highways Act is essential, but non-inclusion of landowner names in notifications does not invalidate the process.
The court clarified that the declaration of land as a National Highway before acquisition and the Competent Authority's order under the 1956 Act do not require strict adherence to judicial procedures....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land acquisition proceedings can be challenged after the passing of the award and receipt of compensation in exceptional cases falling within ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
