B.VEERAPPA, K.S.HEMALEKHA
N. Shreyas – Appellant
Versus
State Of Karnataka, Department Of Higher Education – Respondent
ORDER :
B.Veerappa, J.
The petitioner No.1, who is the aspirant to P.G. seat and has taken NEET – PG 2022 Exams and secured All India Rank of 43445 and eligible for participating in the upcoming counselling and the 2nd petitioner, who is the father of the 1st petitioner, are before this Court seeking the following reliefs:
b) Issue appropriate writs or directions to the respondents to extend the exemption being granted to the Governments Seats (As per Clause 4) and Private Seats (as per Clause 4.2 A) under the Government of Karnataka Examination Authority Bulletin/Guidelines of PG-NEET-2021 vide Annexure 'D' to the Linguistic Minority (MU-Tulu) under the Eligibility Private Seats (As per Clause 4.2D) in the Karnataka Examination Authority Bulletin/Guidelines of PG-NEET for the year 2022.
c) Issue appropriate Writs or orders quashing the condition No.2 in the Government Order No. ED 165 Mahiti 2018 dated 12/09/2018
Dinesh Kumar vs. Motilal Nehru Medical College
Dipali d/o. Uttamrao Dakre, Nanded vs. State of Maharashtra
Dr. Kriti Lakhina and Others vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Dr. Pradeep Jain and Others v. Union of India and Others
Meenakshi Malik vs. University of Delhi and others
Nookavarapu Kanakadurga Devi v. Kakatiya Medical College
Pradeep Jain vs. Union of India
Raman Arora (Dr.) vs. University of Delhi & another
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Pradip Tandon
Vaidhehi Subhash Natu vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Vijay Dattatraya Bhilwadikar vs. State of Maharashtra & another
Under the provisions of Section 23 of the Karnataka Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Determination of Fee) Act which is enacted in the year 2006 in order to avoid in....
Domicile-based eligibility criteria for medical admissions are unconstitutional as they violate the principle of equality under Article 14.
Legitimate classification based on residency for admission into medical programs is constitutional, ensuring local residents benefit while maintaining educational standards contrary to claims of disc....
Point of Law : Article 371J of the Constitution of India reads as President is empowered to provide that the Governor of Karnataka would have special responsibility for The establishment of a separat....
Reservation of postgraduate medical seats based on domicile is constitutional, supporting local education while respecting equality principles.
The court affirmed the management's right to challenge state restrictions on admission based on domicile, emphasizing adherence to established guidelines that permit domicile-free management quotas.
The New Regulation PGMER 2023 permits seat sharing for reservation policies, overriding previous regulations, and minority institutions cannot claim all seats as All India Management Quota.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Medical Council of India was not competent to make regulations contrary to the mandate of Article 15(4) of the Constitution, and that the ....
The court reaffirmed that the rules governing eligibility for education should not unjustly exclude candidates based on residence due to circumstances beyond their control, particularly where a perma....
The state government has the authority to prescribe eligibility criteria for admission to postgraduate medical courses, and such criteria is valid if it is based on merit, is not arbitrary or discrim....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.