Back
B. VEERAPPA, K. NATARAJAN
Deputy Commissioner – Appellant
Versus
S. V. Global Mill Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition background (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on applicability of compensation laws (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. determination of compensation under 2013 act (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 4. analysis of rights to appeal (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 5. conclusion on merits of appeal and intervention (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
B.VEERAPPA J. - The present review petition is filed to review the order dtd. 25/9/2019 made in M.F.A. No.3806/2019 on the file of the Coordinate Bench of this Court, on the basis of the liberty granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
2. It is pertinent to note that the Hon'ble Supreme Court by the order dtd. 11/8/2021 permitted the petitioner to withdraw Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.10452/2021 and to approach this Court by filing a review petition. The Hon'ble Supreme Court relegated the parties back to this Court to argue the point relating to the maintainability of appeal under Sec. 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 ('1894 Act' for short) as the said point was not raised and argued before this Court in the appeal.
I. Brief facts of the ca
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
