Back
S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV
ASHWITH KUMAR, S/O KRISHNAPPA POOJARY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPT. OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYATH RAJ (ZP) – Respondent
ORDER :
(S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV, J.)
The Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking for withdrawal of the petition which reads as follows:
2. However, the Registry has raised an office objection to the memo filed by the counsel for the petitioner which reads as hereunder:
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri. K. Ravishankar submits that the office objection raised by the Registry would defeat the object and purpose of the duly signed 'Vakalatnama' by the parties authorising the advo
Counsel authorized by a signed Vakalatnama can withdraw a petition without the client's signature on the withdrawal memo, as per Order III Rule 4 of CPC.
A petitioner retains the absolute right to withdraw a writ petition at any stage, and upon formal submission, the court should allow such withdrawal.
The authority of a party to withdraw a writ petition at any stage permitted by the court.
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition upon counsel's request and dismissed without costs.
A petitioner can withdraw their petition, leading to its dismissal by the court.
Court permitted withdrawal of writ petition on petitioner's counsel request.
A petitioner can withdraw a writ petition with the court's permission, leading to dismissal of the case.
Withdrawal of petitions under section 482 Cr.P.C. is permissible when requested by the petitioners.
A writ petition can be withdrawn by the petitioner's counsel with a formal request and endorsement, leading to dismissal without costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
