Back
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Siddhi Engineering – Appellant
Versus
Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Aurangabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the respective parties.
2. The Petitioner has put forth prayer clauses (b), (c), (d) and (e), which read as under:
(c) Quash and set-aside impugned orders No MH/AB/83952 dated 23/09/2021; Certificate under Section 8 of the Act; dated 05/04/2022, Notice dated 29/11/2023 of Recovery Officer.
(d) Stay to the Impugned Orders No. MH/AB/83952 dated 23/9/2021; Certificate under Section 8 of the Act, dated 05/04/2022, Notice dated 29/11/2023 of Recovery Officer.
(e) The Respondent be directed stay the Recovery proceeding initiated against the Petitioner during pendency of the Petition.”
3. The Respondent Authority conducted the inquiry of the Petitioner/factory under Section 7(A) of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1952 Act’) for the non-payment of the PF contributions and non-submission of records, for the period from 05/2016 to 05/
The court established that the period of limitation for filing appeals can be extended under Section 14 of the Limitation Act when a party has been engaged in bona fide proceedings before a court wit....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for a liberal construction of 'sufficient cause' and a pragmatic approach to advance substantial justice in applications for condonation o....
The court emphasized a pragmatic approach to justice, stating that delay should be liberally construed under the Limitation Act, and parties should not be penalized for their counsel's non-appearance....
The main legal point established is that the pendency of a representation before the concerned authority can exclude the time for filing an appeal, and the provisions of the Limitation act, 1963, can....
Unexplained delays in filing writ petitions lead to dismissal, emphasizing the need for government departments to act diligently and provide reasonable justifications for delays.
New establishment from same premises with identical activities immediately after predecessor's cessation is continuation; tribunal cannot condone appeal delay beyond 120 days or issue non-reasoned or....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the admissibility of a writ petition challenging Assessment Orders under the CST Act, considering grounds of limitation, lack of opportunity for he....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
