SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 502

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
A. S. Gadkari, Sharmila U. Deshmukh, JJ.
Lata Ratan Rokade - Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr. - Respondents
Criminal Writ Petition No. 2651 of 2023 with Interim Application No.3062 Of 2023
Decided On : 28-06-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Satyavrat Joshi a/w Ms. Shivani Kondekar, Mr. Amit Thorve for the Petitioner; Mr. Ajay Bhise a/w Mr. Mahesh Mule, Mr. Akash Kavde & Ms. Nidhi Narwekar for Applicant-Intervenor in Interim Application No.3062 of 2023; Mr. Ajay Patil, A.PP for Respondents-State. Mr. Raja Thakare, Senior Advocate, amicus-curiae a/w Mr. Siddharth Jagushte.

The court ruled that anticipatory bail cannot be granted under the M.C.O.C. Act when sufficient evidence of involvement is present and that precedent must articulate general legal principles.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Criminal Procedure Code - Section 482 - Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 - Section 23(1)(a) - Anticipatory bail sought challenging prior approval to apply M.C.O.C Act - Approval granted for investigating organized crime syndicate involvement - The petitioner allegedly aided the accused post-crime, but no prior criminal history exists. The court found sufficient evidence against the petitioner, and thus pre-arrest bail application dismissed. (Paras 4, 16, 39)

(B) Legal Precedent - The decision in Shabhana Shaikh (2021) is not binding, as it did not articulate general principles applicable across cases in the context of organized crime law. The court emphasized that pre-arrest bail should be granted cautiously under Article 226, only in rare cases. (Paras 30, 36, 39)

Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments from the petitioner (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. court's examination of the legal and factual questions raised regarding approval and bail. (Para 9 , 10)
4. court's observations on law applicability (Para 11 , 14 , 22 , 24)
5. arguments by the intervenor and reasoning (Para 12 , 18 , 19)
6. legal standards for interpreting organized crime provisions and bail applications. (Para 27 , 28)
7. decisions on binding precedents (Para 30 , 32 , 33 , 38)
8. final conclusion of the court (Para 39 , 41)

JUDGMENT

A.S. Gadkari, J. - Petitioner has invoked jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (for short, 'CrPC.'), challenging the 'Prior Approval' dated 5th July 2023, issued by Respondent No.2, under Section 23(1) (a) of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (for short, 'M.C.O.C. Act') and for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.PC., in C.R. No.346 of 2023, dated 22nd May 2023, registered with Chikhali Police Station, Pimpri-Chinchwad Police Commissionerate, District Pune, under Sections 3 02, 120-B, 34 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and under Section 3 , 25, and 27, of the ARMS ACT , 1959 and under Section 3 7(1), (3) read with 135 of the MAHARASHTRA POLICE ACT and under Sections 3 (1) (ii), 3(4) of the M.C.O.C. Act.

1.1 The Intervenor is the original complainant / informant and has filed the aforenoted Interim Application for intervention, to address the Court and to oppose the prayer of the Petitioner.

2. Heard Mr. Joshi, learned counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Bhise, learned counsel for the Intervenor, Mr. Raja Thakare, learned senior counsel, amicus curiae, and Mr. Patil, learned A.PP for the Respondents. Perused entire record produced before us and the Written Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner, dated 25th October 2023.

3. The First Information Report is lodged by Mr. Rajendra K. Karle on 22nd May 2023. The informant is the maternal uncle of Krushna @ Sonya H. Tapkir (deceased). The prosecution case in brief is that, during the Navratri Festival arranged at Patil Nagar, Chikhali in the preceding year, a tussle took place between Karan Rokade (A.No.1) and his friends on one side and Krushna @ Sonya and his friends on the other side. In the said tussle altercations took place. At that time, Karan Rokade had threatened Krushna @ Sonya of dire consequences. Karan Rokade was also having grudge against Krushna @ Sonya, as the popularity of Krushna @ Sonya was on rise in the vicinity of Chikhali. That, on 22nd May 2023 at about 2.19 p.m. the informant received a call from his sister Smt. Jayashree H. Tapkir, who informed him that Krushna @ Sonya has been assaulted by somebody and admitted in hospital. The informant's nephew namely Milind told him that, on 21st May 2023 one Mr. Saurabh @ Sonya Pansare had come to meet Krushna @ Sonya and apologized for whatever happened during the Navratri Festival and to forget about the past. That, a friend of the informant told him that, at about 1.40 - 1.45 p.m. on the same day Saurabh Pansare and Siddharth Kamble had came on a bike at the place of offence, where Krushna @ Sonya and his friend were standing and thereafter Saurabh Pansare fired bullets on the chest, neck and other parts of body of Krushna @ Sonya and fled away on their KTM motorcycle. Krushna @ Sonya passed away on 22nd May 2023, while undergoing medical treatment. In this brief premise, present crime is registered.

4. During the course of investigation it revealed to the police that, the murder of Krushna @ Sonya is committed by the organised crime syndicate headed by Karan Ratan Rokade (A.No.1) and therefore the Senior Inspector of Police, Chikhali Police Station submitted a report dated 29th June 2023 to the Respondent No.2 for applying the provisions of M.C.O.C. Act to the said C.R. No. 346 of 2023. In the said proposal the Petitioner is named at Sr. No. 12, as a member o

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top