State of Maharashtra VS Digambar Manik Kalyankar

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

R. G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Digambar Manik Kalyankar – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Amit S. Deshpande, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. B. B. Bhise

Table of Content
1. background on land acquisition proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court observations on evidence and comparison of sale instances. (Para 4)
3. claimants' arguments for enhanced compensation. (Para 5 , 6)
4. state's arguments against enhancement of compensation. (Para 7)
5. court's consideration of evidence and sale instances. (Para 9 , 10)
6. verification of evidence for determining market value. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
7. determination of compensation rate. (Para 14 , 15)
8. inclusion of development charges in compensation. (Para 16 , 17)
9. final order of the court. (Para 18)

JUDGMENT :

NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.

1. These are the Appeals under Section 54 of the LAND ACQUISITION ACT , 1894 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’] against the Judgment and Decree/Award dated 08/04/2013, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Reference Court’] in group of references arising out of the Land Acquisition Proceedings under the said Act initiated by the Land Acquisition Officer [hereinafter referred to as ‘the LAO’] for the purpose of Police Training School at Babhalgaon, Taluka and District Latur vide No.2006/LNQ/CR-1.

2. The Claimants pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

R. G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTEState of Maharashtra – AppellantVersusDigambar Manik Kalyankar – Respondent

Cases Referred (29)

R. G. AVACHAT, NEERAJ P. DHOTE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Digambar Manik Kalyankar – Respondent