JUDGMENT :

MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

1. This Review Petition is filed on 12.02.2024 for seeking recall of judgment dated 19.01.2024 passed by this Court while deciding Writ Petition No. 1320 of 2023. By virtue of the said judgment, Writ Petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 50,000/- to be paid by the Petitioner. At the outset, Mr. Joshi, learned Advocate appearing for Review Petitioner would orally inform across the bar that the cost of Rs. 50,000/- has been paid by Petitioner as directed, since an objection is raised by Mr. Khandeparkar that it was not paid. I do not have any reason to disbelieve Mr. Joshi’s statement. Hence, Review Petition is taken up for hearing.

2. Perusal of Review Petition reveals that review is sought on the basis that there is an error apparent on the face of record in the proceedings. Though, Mr. Joshi would argue that there is an error apparent on the face of record in the detailed judgment dated 09.01.2024 but he would candidly clarify that the alleged error apparent on the face of record is not in the judgment dated 09.01.2024 but it is reflected in Respondent No. 4 - Apex Grievance Redressal Committee’s (for short “AGRC”) order dated 29.09.2022 which was i