Back
A. S. CHANDURKAR
Kunal Kamra – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by the Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.
OPINION:
| S. No. | Particulars |
| (A) | Facts leading to the reference |
| (B) | Judgments of the Division Bench |
| (C) | Consideration of interim relief |
| (D) | Proceedings before the Supreme Court |
| (E) | Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner in WP (L) No. 9792 of 2023 |
| (F) | Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner in WP (L) No. 14955 of 2023 |
| (G) | Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 7953 of 2023 |
| (H) | Submissions on behalf of the applicants in Interim Application (L) No. 17704 of 2023 |
| (I) | Submissions on behalf of Union of India |
| (J) | Scope under Clause 36 of the Letters Patent |
| (K) | Points on which either there is no difference of opinion or an opinion is expressed only by one learned Judge of the Division Bench |
| (L) | Relevant constitutional and statutory provisions |
| (M) | Opinion on the points of difference. |
| (a) Article 19(1)(a) and Article 19(2) of the Constitution of India. | |
| (b) Violation of Article 19(1)(g) read with Article 19(6). | |
| (c | |
The amended Rule 3(1)(b)(v) is unconstitutional as it violates Articles 14, 19(1)(a), and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution, is vague, ultra vires, and imposes disproportionate restrictions on free expres....
The impugned rule does not violate constitutional rights as it aims to curb misinformation while preserving the right to free speech, establishing clear parameters around false content concerning gov....
The 2023 amendment to regulate online content was held unconstitutional for violating fundamental rights, lacking clear guidelines, and enabling arbitrary government censorship.
The court's decision was based on the balance of convenience and the lack of irreversible consequences from the FCU's notification, as well as the absence of grave and irreparable loss shown to resul....
The court established that vague and overbroad regulations can violate constitutional rights and be struck down as unconstitutional.
The increased fees for information applications under the Right to Information Act do not infringe upon constitutional rights and are within the legislative authority, emphasizing that hardship alone....
Pornographic website – Social media account compromised - Removal or access disablement of offending content to be effective even within India, a search engine must block the search results througho....
An intermediary, such as the petitioner, is entitled to claim protection under Section 79 of the I.T. Act when compliance with the 'due diligence' requirement under Rule 3 of the I.T. Guidelines is e....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
