J.CHELAMESWAR, ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
SHREYA SINGHAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Judgment
R.F. Nariman, J.
1. This batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India raises very important and far-reaching questions relatable primarily to the fundamental right of free speech and expression guaranteed by Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India. The immediate cause for concern in these petitions is Section 66A of the Information Technology Act of 2000. This Section was not in the Act as originally enacted, but came into force by virtue of an Amendment Act of 2009 with effect from 27.10.2009. Since all the arguments raised by several counsel for the petitioners deal with the unconstitutionality of this Section it is set out hereinbelow:
“66-A. Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc. —Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device,—
(a) any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character; or
(b) any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred or ill will, persistently by making use of such computer resource or a communication dev
Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras
Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
Bennett Coleman & Co. v. Union of India
Kameshwar Prasad v. The State of Bihar
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Private Limited v. Union of India
Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. Union of India
The Superintendent, Central Prison, Fatehgarh v. Ram Manohar Lohia
Chintaman Rao v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Mohd. Faruk v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Brij Bhushan v. State of Delhi
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar & Ors.
Arun Ghosh v. State of West Bengal
State of Bihar v. Shailabala Devi
Ramji Lal Modi v. The State of U.P.
Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar
Dr. Ramesh Yeshwant Prabhoo v. Prabhakar Kashinath Kunte
Ranjit Udeshi v. State of Maharashtra [1965] 1 S.C.R. 65 – Relied upon [Para 45]
Director General, Directorate General of Doordarshan v. Anand Patwardhan
Aveek Sarkar v. State of West Bengal
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Baldeo Prasad
K.A. Abbas v. The Union of India
Harakchand Ratanchand Banthia v. Union of India
State of M.P. v. Kedia Leather & Liquor Limited
State of Karnataka v. Appa Balu Ingale
Kedar Nath Singh v. State of Bihar
Kameshwar Prasad v. The State of Bihar
The Collector of Customs, Madras v. Nathella Sampathu Chetty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.