AVINASH G. GHAROTE, M. S. JAWALKAR
Rashmi W/o Shyamkumar Barve – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner and Member, Nagpur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsels appearing for the parties.
2. Heard Mr. S.R. Narnaware, learned counsel for the petitioner; Dr. Birendra Saraf, learned Advocate General with Mr. D.V. Chavan, learned Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3, 5 and 8; Mr. M.P. Khajanchi, learned counsel for respondent No. 7 and Miss Neerja Choube, learned counsel for respondent No. 4.
3. On 04/04/2024, upon hearing the learned counsels for the parties for interim relief, we had passed the following order:
2. The basic reliefs claimed in the petition is against the decision passed by the Caste Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur, dated 28/03/2024, (Page-135), by which, the caste claim of the petitioner belonging to Scheduled Caste ‘Chambhar’ which was earlier validated by the Caste Scrutiny Committee on 17/
Grindlays Bank Ltd. v. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal
Indian Bank Vs. Satyam Fibres (India) Pvt. Ltd. (1996) 5 SCC 550
Indian National Congress (I) Vs. Institute of Social Welfare and Others
Ishwar Mahton v. Sitaram Kumar
J. Chitra Vs. District Collector and Chairman State Level Vigilance Committee, Tamil Nadu and Others
Kapra Mazdoor Ekta Union Vs. Birla Cotton Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd. and Another
Kumari Madhuri Patil and Another Vs. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and Others
Lekshmi Amma Chacki Amma v. Mammen Mammen
Lily Thomas and Others Vs. Union of India and Others
Madhuri Patil v. Comm. Tribal Development
Madhuri Patil vs. Commr. Tribal Development
Manda Jaganath v. K.S. Rathnam
Marri Chandrashekhar Rao vs. Dean, G.S. Medical College and Others
N.P. Ponnuswami v. The Returning Officer
P.S.R. Sadhanantham v. Arunachalam
Pankaj Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Patel Narshi Thakershi and Others Vs. Shri Pradyumansinghji Arjunsinghji
Rajendra Singh v. State of M.P. (1996) 5 SCC 460 : AIR 1996 SC 2736
Rajeshwar Baburao Bone v. State of Maharashtra
Raju Ramsing Vasave Vs. Mahesh Deorao Bhivapurkar and Others
Ram Phal Kundu v. Kamal Sharma
Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs. Ashok Hurra and Another
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu (Dead) by LRs. Vs. Jagannath (Dead) by LRs. and Others
Saghir Ahmad v. State of U.P. AIR 1954 SC 728
Sandeep S/o Manoharrao Waysal Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Satish Chandra Chatterji v. Kumar Satish Kantha Roy
Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Vs. Raj Kumar Rajinder Singh (Dead) through Legal Representatives and Others
Shanti Kumar R. Canji v. Home Insurance Co. of New York
Shri Ram Sahu (Dead) through Legal Representatives and Others Vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat and Others
State of Orissa v. Madan Gopal Rungta
State of Punjab Vs. Davinder Pal Singh Bhullar
State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Sudhir Kumar Singh and Others
State of Uttaranchal v. Balwant Singh Chaufal
Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare vs. State of Maharashtra
Sudhakar Vitthal Kumbhare Vs. State of Maharashtra
Sukh Sagar Medical College and Hospital Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Tamilnad Mercantile Bank Shareholders Welfare Assn. v. S.C. Sekar
Tara Bai v. V.S. Krishnaswamy Rao
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Singh and Others
Vinod Pandurang Bharsakade v. Returning Officer
A.R. Antulay Vs. R.S. Nayak and Another
Apoorva D/o Vijay Nichale Vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No. 1 and Others
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Benoy Krishna Mukerjee v. Mohanlal Goenka
Bharat Bhimrao Malakwade Vs. Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee
Bindeshwari Pd. Chaudhary v. Debendra Pd. Singh
Calcutta Gas Co. (Proprietary) Ltd. v. State of West Bengal
Dalip Singh v. State of U.P. (2010) 2 SCC 114 : (2010) 1 SCC (Civ) 324
Devendra Gurunath Khedgikar Vs. Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Pune and Another
Dinesh Gupta Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another
District Collector, Satara and Another Vs. Mangesh Nivrutti Kashid
The Caste Scrutiny Committee lacks the authority to review a validated caste certificate; it can only cancel it if fraud is proven, and must afford a fair hearing as dictated by principles of natural....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the procedural requirement for issuing a show cause notice when the vigilance report is in favor of the petitioner, as required by Rule 17(11)(i) o....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that a person with a case based on falsehood has no right to approach the Court, and knowingly producing fabricated and fraudulent documents to ....
The Scrutiny Committee cannot invalidate tribe validity certificates of blood relatives without evidence of fraud or jurisdictional issues; valid certificates must be accepted to ensure consistency a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Scrutiny Committee had no statutory power to re-examine a Caste Validity Certificate already issued, and thus, the cancellation was withou....
Caste Scrutiny Committee lacks jurisdiction to suo motu review validity certificates; review powers must be statutory, not inherent.
Caste claim – Forged and fabricated - - Forefather of the respondent no.3 were “Sikh Chamar”, the respondent no.2 accepted the caste claim of the respondent no.3 as “Mochi” which is a separate caste ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for the Scrutiny Committee's procedure to comply with principles of natural justice and fair play, including providing the petition....
Caste certificates issued after due procedure possess a presumption of validity, which cannot be disregarded without substantial evidence of fraud or misrepresentation.
Caste Certificates must be presumed valid if issued following due process unless proved fraudulent; 'Sheikh' is deemed a title, not a caste, within Muslim community.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.