G. S. KULKARNI, FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA
Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Pune – Appellant
Versus
Kasliwal Medical Care & Research Foundation, Solapur – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(G.S. Kulkarni, J.)
1. This appeal under Section 260 of the Income-Tax Act, 1961 (for short “I.T. Act”) filed by the revenue is directed against an order dated 28 March, 2008 passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench (for short “Tribunal”) whereby the respondent/assessee’s appeal arising from an order dated 15 September, 2006 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax-IV, Pune (for short (“CIT)) under Section 12AA read with Section 12A of the I.T. Act has been allowed. By the impugned order, the Tribunal has held that as the CIT did not pass an order granting or refusing registration of the assessee under Section 12A(1) within a period of six months as prescribed under Section 12AA(2) of the I.T. Act, the assessee is deemed to have been granted a registration. The Tribunal accordingly held that the order of CIT refusing registration was a nullity requiring it to be quashed and set aside. The assessment year in question is A.Y. 2005-06.
2. By an order dated 6 June, 2011, the present appeal came to be admitted on the following question of law:
Indian Petrochemicals Corporation Ltd. & Anr. vs. Shramik Sena
Jaisri Sahu Vs. Rajdewan Dubey
Kunhayammed and others vs. State of Kerala & Anr.
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi
Padmasundara Rao (Dead) v. State of Tamil Nadu (2002) 255 ITR 147 (SC)
Pramatha Nath v. Chief Justice
R. Rama Subbarayalu v. Rengammal
Rajesh and others v. Rajbir Singh and ors
Reshma Kumari and others v. Madan Mohan and anr.
Sahitya Sadawart Samiti vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Santosh Anand v. Union of India
Sovachand Mulchand v. Collector, Central Excise
Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs. State of Maharashtra
U.P. State Road Transport Corpn. v. Trade Transport Tribunal
The Income-Tax Act does not provide for deemed registration of trusts if the application is not decided within six months, as confirmed by the Supreme Court.
Deemed registration under the Income Tax Act is valid if no response is received within six months; existing registration remains effective despite subsequent unnecessary applications.
Technical mistake in selecting wrong code for provisional registration u/s 12AB/80G cannot justify rejection of final application or cancellation; remand for rectification and merits-based decision.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.