HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGEHON'BLE JUSTICE ASHWIN DAMODAR BHOBE, RAVINDRA V. GHUGE
Gaurav Madan Bhangare - Appellant
Versus
Nashik Municipal Corporation - Respondent
WP/1776/2024
Decided On : 12-02-2025
(A) The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Section 28(1) - Constitution of India - Article 226 - Daily wage workers' rights - Petitioners sought regularization and permanency in employment with Nashik Municipal Corporation after years of service. The court found that the Corporation had committed unfair labor practices by not absorbing the workers despite their long tenure and the existence of vacant posts. The court directed the Corporation to prepare a list of daily wagers for regularization and to forward this to the State Government for post creation. (Paras 5, 25, 26)
(B) Employment Rights - Regularization of daily wagers - The court emphasized that employees performing essential duties for extended periods have a legitimate right to regularization. The judgment in Umadevi was clarified to not penalize long-serving employees and to allow for regularization in cases of continuous service. (Paras 17, 26)
Facts of the case:
The Petitioners, daily wage workers with the Nashik Municipal Corporation, sought regularization after years of service, alleging unfair labor practices by the Corporation. Some Petitioners had passed away, and others had reached superannuation. (Paras 2, 15)
Findings of Court:
The court found that the Nashik Municipal Corporation had failed to absorb daily wage workers despite the existence of vacant posts and directed the creation of posts for regularization. (Paras 25, 26)
Issues: The main issues included the right of daily wage workers to regularization and the legality of the Corporation's actions in not absorbing them. (Paras 5, 25)
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the long-term service of daily wage workers entitled them to regularization, emphasizing that the principles established in Umadevi should not be misapplied to deny their claims. (Paras 17, 26)
Result: Writ petitions are partly allowed; the impugned communications are quashed, and directions for regularization are issued.
JUDGMENT :
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.
2. All these Petitioners are identically placed. Few of them are said to have passed away and some have attained the age of superannuation. Two Petitioners have died, namely, Vijay Nivrutti Kothule and Anil Lahanu Patil. On oral request, the Legal Representatives are permitted to be brought on record. This addition / amendment be carried out within 15 days.
3. Since all these Petitioners are identically placed as daily wage workers working with the Nashik Municipal Corporation, we are adverting to the prayers put forth in the first Petition.
4. For the sake of brevity, we are reproducing prayer clause (b), (b1), (b2), (b3) and (b4), here under :-
“(b) A writ of Mandamus or any other Writ or order or direction in the nature of Writ under Art 226 of the Constitution of India be issued ordering and directing the Respondents to issue appropriate orders absorbing/appointing the Petitioner in the services as a Helper, Valvemen and Class IV with effect from 19.04.2011 in the Respondent Corporation together with all consequential benefits.
(b.1) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to hold and declare that the petitioner is entitled for benefit of permanency and absorptions in vacant posts available on establishment of Municipal Corporation and further entitled for all consequential and monetary benefits.
(b.2) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to hold and declare that impugned communications dated 26.10.2018 issued by the Dy. Commissioner to Section Officer of UDC, Mantralaya, Mumbai and impugned communication dated 04.02.2019 issued by the Dy. Secretary of Maharashtra to Commissioner of Nashik Municipal Corporation are ex-facie illegal, contrary to orders passed by Hon’ble Industrial Tribunal in complaint ULP No. 16-26 of 2010 and confirmed in W.P.3225 of 2012 and other connected matters which are at Exh “C” & Exh “D” to the present petition.
(b.3) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct to Municipal Corporation as well as the State Government to absorb the Petitioner on the existing vacant post and / or direct State government to grant sanction for creating the posts.
(b.4) Pending the hearing and final disposal of the abovementioned Petition the Respondent their agents, Servants or anybody claiming through them be restrained by temporary injunction from discontinuing services of the Petitioner.”
5. Considering the facts of these cases and the voluminous record, we are not required to refer to all those documents in this judgment for the reason that all these Petitioners had approached the Industrial Court at Nashik by preferring ULP complaints in 2010, under Section 28(1) of The Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU and PULP Act). They had alleged unfair labour practices against the Corporation under Items Nos.5, 6 and 9 of Schedule IV. By a common judgment dated 19th April, 2011, the Industrial Court recorded in Paragraph No.36 and issued directions under Paragraph No.38, as under:
“(36)….Record shows that the Govt. of Maharashtra has given permission from time to time for creation of several posts and to absorb the employees in regular employment who were working with contractor. The Govt of Maharashtra Resolution No. 10.5.2023 about 12205 employees working on daily wages are directed to be absorbed In regular employment of respondent. Record shows that about 5 posts of Wireman, 2 posts of Pump Operator, 1 post of Oilman, 9 posts of Valveman, 1 post of B-Grade Pump Operator and 46 posts of bigari total 59 posts are vacant with the various pumping stations of the Respondent Nashik Municipal Corporation. The Standing Committee of the respondent Nashik Municipal Corporation has passed resolution No. 902 dated 31.1.2008 Exh. U-23/1 for getting sanction to the posts of Wireman, Electrician, Pump Operator, Oilman, Valveman and Bigari. The Mahasabha of the resp



Long-serving daily wage workers have a legitimate right to regularization, and the misapplication of legal principles should not deny them this right.
Long-serving temporary employees performing essential functions may be regularized despite procedural lapses, ensuring fair employment rights and protections.
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
Long-standing service and fulfillment of criteria establish entitlement for regularization under service law, preventing arbitrary denial of rights.
Long continuous service (>10 years) as daily wagers on perennial essential duties entitles regularization consideration despite irregular initial engagement; distinguishes irregular from illegal appo....
Long-serving employees in essential roles are entitled to consideration for regularization despite initial irregular appointments, ensuring fairness and adherence to constitutional principles.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.