SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1114

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA 
BHARATI DANGRE, NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.
Shri Domnic Furtado (ST) and Ors. – Petitioners
Versus
State of Goa, Through its Secretary, Secretariat, Porvorim, Goa and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 120 of 2021
Decided On : 04-08-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Shivraj Gaonkar, Advocate
For the Respondents:Mr. D. Pangam, Advocate General with Mr. Deep Shirodkar, Additional Government Advocate, Mr. Somnath Karpe, Advocate with Mr. Anand Shirodkar, Advocate.

Long-serving temporary employees performing essential functions may be regularized despite procedural lapses, ensuring fair employment rights and protections.

Headnote:(A) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(P) and 18(1) - Regularization of Daily Wagers - The Petitioners, Daily Wagers with the Margao Municipal Council, sought regularization under a settlement dated 08.05.2014, which mandates regularization after five years of continuous service - Previous Office Memoranda from 1990 and 2000 further supported the claim, reiterating the government’s policy for regularizing employees after five years - The Municipal Council conducted a Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) that recommended their regularization based on this policy, but the State opposed the regularization by citing lack of advertisement prior to appointment. (Para 12 & 14)

(B) Legal principles - The court noted that regularization cannot be denied based solely on the procedural technicality of not advertising posts, especially for long-serving workers rendering essential services - The decision in Uma Devi (2006) does not penalize long-serving employees performing essential functions. (Paras 20-21)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners were appointed as Daily Wagers with the Margao Municipal Council for over five years, performing garbage collection and road work, but were denied regularization based on state opposition despite previous approvals for regularization as per past settlements and circulars.

Findings of Court:
The court ruled that the Petitioners should be regularized as workers in line with the government’s own policies and previous orders, holding that the state’s objection lacked merit and quashing the order to keep their appointments in abeyance.

Issues: The court addressed whether the lack of advertisement for vacancies could undermine the regularization of long-serving employees and the validity of their appointments despite prior agreements and state policies.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that continued service in essential roles warrants regularization irrespective of procedural lapses, supporting workers' rights to fair employment without hindrance from bureaucratic formalities.

Result: Writ Petition allowed, appointment orders of Petitioners upheld.

Table of Content
1. regularization policy for long-serving employees (Para 1 , 2)
2. settlement terms for regularization accepted (Para 3 , 4)
3. implementation of regularization process (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
4. challenge to abeyance order for regularization (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. critique of state's opposition to regularization (Para 13 , 14)
6. legal precedent regarding regularization (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. entitlement of petitioners under established policy (Para 18 , 19)
8. judgment favoring regularization upheld (Para 20)

JUDGMENT :

Bharati Dangre, J.

1. The twelve Petitioners before us appointed as Daily Wagers with the Margao Municipal Council, rely upon the Office Memorandum dated 29.10.1990 issued by the Government of Goa, where a decision was taken by the Government to consider regularization of employees, who have completed more than five years of continuous service either as NMRs/Daily Wagers subject to the condition that the work to be provided to them should be available on continuous basis and the persons should qualify for the post as per the Recruitment Rules.

2. The very same direction was reiterated in form of instructions issued by the Government of Goa in the Office Memorandum dated 07.06.2000, to the following effect :

“The Government vide O.M. No.9/1/90-Fin (R & C) dated 9/10/1990 from Finance ( Rev & control) Department has issued instructions to the effect that once the employee completes 5 years of continuous service as NMRs/Daily Wager, he/she would automatically qualify for being considered for regularization subject to the conditions laid down therein. Now the Government has further decided that those who have completed 5 years in Government service are to be regularized.”

It is the case of the Petitioners that though they were appointed on Daily Wage basis to carry out the work of garbage collectors and act as road workers, their salaries were paid on monthly basis. Their appointment was extended on month to month basis right from their appointment.

In the year 2006, 39 Daily Wagers who had completed continuous five years of service, were regularised by the Margao Municipal Council, by appointing them on probation period of two years and also with a stipulation that they shall carry out the work/duty as entrusted to them by the employer and by making the relevant Rules/Agreement applicable to them.

3. It is the specific case of the Petitioners that a settlement dated 08.05.2014 was arrived at under Section 2 (P) read with Section 18 (1) of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947, between the Municipal Council and their workers/employees represented by the Goa Municipal Council Association, Margao, in a charter of demands and the terms of settlement included the following :

“D) Demand regarding regularization of Daily rated employees/Workers.

It is agreed between the parties that as per the Circular No.9/58/2001-PER-Part dated 10/02/2014 received from Department of Personnel, Government of Goa it is agreed to regularize those employees/workers who are working as daily wages for five years and above.”

The Memorandum of Settlement recorded that the settlement shall operate for three years from 01.07.2013 to 30.06.2016 and shall continue to remain in force until the same is terminated by either party in writing in accordance with law.

4. In the backdrop of this, the time was ripe for implementation of the settlement and this came for discussion in the meeting of the Municipal Council held on 18.08.2014, when it was resolved that a list of eligible candidates shall be prepared and submitted for regularisation to the Director (Urban Development) for its approval and once the approval is obtained, the eligible staff shall be regularised.

The Department of Urban Development, with respect to the subject, of 'Approval for regularisation' informed the Chief Officer that Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) shall be constituted to arrive at an appropriate decision and reference was also made to the office Memorandum dated 29.10.19

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top