Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
R.I.CHAGLA
Board of Control for Cricket in India – Appellant
Versus
Kochi Cricket Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R. I. CHAGLA, J.
1. By Arbitration Petition No. 1752 of 2015, the Award dated 22nd June 2015 has been assailed (Arbitration Petition No. 1752 of 2015 of Kochi Cricket Private Limited is for convenience referred to as “KCPL’s Petition”). By Arbitration Petition No. 1753 of 2015, the separate Award having the same date i.e. 22nd June 2015 has been assailed (Arbitration Petition No. 1753 of 2015 of M/s. Rendezvour Sports World is for convenience referred to as “RSW’s Petition”).
2. The Award assailed in KCPL’s Petition pertains to disputes emanating out of Franchise Agreement dated 12th March 2011 between KCPL and Board of Control for Cricket in India (“BCCI”), whereas the Award assailed in RSW’s Petition pertains to disputes emanating out of Franchise Agreement dated 11th April 2010 between RSW and BCCI.
3. In view of there being commonality of facts and intrinsical linkage of both KCPL and RSW references, the disputes under both, KCPL’s Franchise Agreement (“KCPL-FA”) and RSW’s Franchise Agreement (“RSW-FA”) came to be consolidated and adjudicated upon by the same Tribunal, by mutual consent of parties. 4. A brief background of facts is necessary and which are as under :-
i. B
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
