SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Pat) 281

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, S.SHAMSUL HASAN
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Ramdaras Ahir – Respondent


Judgment

S.S.SANDHAWALIA, J.

1. Whether a callous inordinate delay of a decade or more would render the verdict of a clean acquittal on a capital charge and the consequent double presumption of innocence virtually impregnable against any challenge by way of a State appeal directed against such acquittal is the spinal question herein.

2. In the larger vista of the issue of grievous and inordinate delays fouling the pure stream of criminal justice and even involving a violation of human rights, the facts of this particular case would pale into insignificance. Nevertheless, the law cannot be divorced from the terra firma of its factual foundation and, therefore, a somewhat brief notice of the background thereof is necessary. The prosecution case arose from a somewhat common-place occurrence which allegedly took place as far back as on 11-4-1969, in the sleepy village Chandi English, police station Bikramganj. The suggested motive for the crime is a trivial one being a petty altercation betwixt school boys. On the date of occurrence Hira Lal, son of the deceased Saligram, and, Shrinewas and Sheodayal, sons of the accused-respondent Baijnath Ahir and Ramlochan Ahir, respectively, had fal







































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top