IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
S. Kumar, J.
Laxmikant Sharma & Ors. - Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar & Ors. - Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14267 of 2014 and Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15188 of 2014
Decided On : 30-11-2021
Bihar Co-operative Societies Rules, 1959 – Rule 7(4) – Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 – Constitution of India – Article 19(1)(c) – Vires of Rule 7(4) – Subordinate legislation must conform with requirements of Constitution and fundamental rights – Composition of Society is one of essential features that are guaranteed by Article 19(1)(c) – Introduction of Rule 7(4) in Bihar Cooperative Societies Rules, 1959 trudges over right of members of PACS to regulate Membership in PACS – Voluntary nature of association is eradicated and it no longer resembles Co-operative Society that was originally created – Rule 7(4) provides unfettered power to State Government and its local officers to determine which applicant shall be made a member to a PACS – It cannot be workable alongside existing procedures of Rule 7(1) and 7(2) – An applicant is not required to interact with, be inspected by, or even make Society aware of their desire to become a member before an order can inevitably make them a member of State Government or its other officers – Rule 7(4) is an absolute power to make an applicant a member of PACS – Statute governs right of an individual – Right to become or to continue being a member of Society is a statutory right – Grant of Membership is a mere opportunity that is dependant upon acceptance given by existing members of Society subject to bye-laws and procedures under the Act and Rules. (Paras 46 to 50 and 53)
Bihar Co-operative Societies Rules, 1959 – Rule 7(4) – Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 – Constitution of India – Article 19(1)(c) – Vires of Rule 7(4) – Rule 7(4) is ultra vires and unconstitutional for it falls foul of Article 19(1)(c) as also Parent Statute – Rule 7(4) provides an alternative mechanism for admission of new members into a PACS without need for assent of its Managing Committee – This procedure makes existing process redundant – Procedure under Rule 7(4) does not have a provision for an appeal against authority's decision – A provision of appeal has been envisaged under parent Act – Rule 7(4) falls foul of Article 19(1)(c) as it empowers State to interfere with composition of Society in a manner not envisaged by Parent Act – Parent Act does not contemplate a situation where State Government through its officers, can determine composition of Society without consent of original members – Object and purpose of Rule 7(4) do not satisfy requirement of a reasonable restriction to fundamental right guaranteed to every citizen under Article 19(1)(c) – It is in excess of powers prescribed under Parent Act – It is violative of Article 19(1)(c) as it makes power of general members deciding upon new Membership, redundant – It is manifestly arbitrary and unreasonable as it does not have a redressal mechanism or a procedure of appeal – It creates an incongruous situation of usurping power of a superior officer by making their order subject to scrutiny by subordinate officers. (Paras 75 and 76)
JUDGMENT (CAV)
1. The following issues arise for consideration:
1. Whether the Bihar Co-operative Societies Rules, 1959 (referred to as the Rules) suffer from the vice of excessive delegation of the powers envisaged under the parent Statute, i.e. the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 (referred to as the Act)?
2. Whether the power to the specified officers to grant membership in a society violates Article 19(1)(c) of the Constitution of India; and provisions of the Act?
3. Whether the order passed by a superior authority can be subjected to scrutiny by an authority subordinate to it? Whether the Rules provide for a redressal or appeal mechanism against the orders passed by such subordinate authority? Hence, whether Rule 7(4) of the subordinate legislation (Rules) is manifestly arbitrary?
2. The Petitioners in the present petition are a Primary Agricultural Co-operative Society ("PACS") and are aggrieved by the State's actions dated 25.03.2013, directing PACS to enrol a minimum of 1000 members from amongst the weaker section of particular caste denominations. This was to be done by way of a special camp in the presence of all the members of the Managing Committee, Block Co-operative Extension Officer, and the PACS Manager, failing which disciplinary proceedings were to be initiated against all concerned. This action was challenged in CWJC No. 18367 of 2013 titled Dasdhrath Singh versus The State of Bihar & Ors. Vide order dated 01.11.2013, this Court stayed the directives issued by the State Government.
3. However, the State Government directed the local officers of various districts to commence the exercise of membership drive of the PACS at their level. Under that, the BDO, Paliganj, inducted many persons as members of the Petitioner-Society. This was vide letter Nos. 1225, 1225(ka) dated 26.06.2014, letter No. 1273, 1285 dated 28.06.2014, letter Nos. 1287, 1300, 1301 dated 30.06.2014 and the exercise was carried out under Rule 7(4) of the Rules.
4. The petitioners claim that the exercise of power is by a usurpation of the powers of the PACS and its Managing Committee.
5. Hence the writ petition (CWJC No. 14267 of 2014 titled as Laxmikant Sharma & Ors. Versus the State of Bihar & Ors.) with the following prayers: -
"(i) To declare that the provisions of impugned Rule 7(4) of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Rules, 1959 as ultra vires the Constitution of India being violative of Articles 19(1)(c), 43(b) and 243(ZL) of the Constitution of India as well as ultra vires the Sections 27(1), 32A(1)(n) and (p) of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, 1935 in so far as the same completely encroaches the domain of the Primary Agricultural Society registered under the Bihar Co-operative Societies Act, 1935 with respect to the Membership of the PACS giving the said power/prerogative to the Government functionaries such as Block Development Officer, Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Societies and District Cooperative Officer.
(ii) To consequently quash the order dated 26.06.2014 contained in letters No.1225, 1225(ka), order dated 28.6.2014 contained in letters No. 1273, 1285, order dated 30.06.2014 contained in letter No. 1287, 1300 and 1301 issued by the Block Development Officer, Paliganj in exercise of power vested in him under Rule 7(4) of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Rules, 1959 by which 250 persons were made members of petitioners Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, Paliganj (Patna) as being illegal and without jurisdiction.
(iii) To any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioners are found to be entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case."
6. Similar is the relief and issue in the analogous matter.
Submissions of the Petitioner
7. Shri Y. V. Giri, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits that under Rule 7, any person wanting to obtain Membership of a society has to apply in Form-V. The Act is a self-contained Code and Rule 7(4) suffers from the vice of-(a) excessive delegation; (b) arbitrariness; a
Andhra Pradesh Dairy Development Corporation Federation v. B. Narasimha Reddy
Damyanti Naranga v. Union of India
Dwarka Nath v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi. (1971) 2 SCC 314
Dwarka Prasad Laxmi Narain v. State of U.P.
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd. v. Union of India(1985) 1 SCC 641
Kerala SEB v. Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd.
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. v. State of Karnataka
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Sharma Transport v. State of A.P.
State of Tamil Nadu v. P. Krishnamurthy
State of U.P. v. C.O.D Chheoki Employees' Cooperative Society
Vipulbhai M. Chaudhary v. Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation Limited and Others
Point of Law : Sec.2(l) of KCS Act defines “member” as “member” means a person joining in application for registration of a co-operative society or a person admitted to membership after such registra....
The amendment allowing nomination of women to co-operative committees is constitutional, reinforcing women's participation while affirming that election is not the exclusive method for committee form....
The restriction on designated officers serving beyond six years under Section 73-A(5) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act is constitutionally valid as it promotes democratic governance and ....
The disqualification under Section 21-A of the A.P. Cooperative Societies Act does not affect the general body membership of the cooperatives, emphasizing distinct roles of committees and general bod....
The court reaffirmed that cooperative society membership is a personal right requiring statutory notice prior to removal, and that an administrator lacks authority to confer membership, ensuring adhe....
The court established that under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, a cooperative society is obligated to accept all qualified membership applications, and any disputes regarding membership m....
The main legal point established is that a cooperative society cannot refuse admission to qualified individuals, and any dispute regarding membership can only be remedied by filing a dispute under Se....
The general body of a co-operative society possesses an inherent democratic right to remove a managing committee through a no-confidence motion. Such a procedure, when codified in statutory rules, is....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.