ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, VIKASH JAIN, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Suo Motu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Question 1? Question 2? Question 3?
Key Points: - Point 1 (!) - Point 2 (!) - Point 3 (!) - Point 4 (!) - Point 5 (!) - Point 6 (!) - Point 7 (!) - Point 8 (!) - Point 9 (!) - Point 10 (!)
JUDGMENT
Vikash Jain, J. - Noticing, during the hearing of Cr.W.J.C. No. 887 of 2013 and an analogous case on 01.03.2021, a huge structure being constructed in close proximity of the northern side of the newly inaugurated Centenary Building of the Patna High Court, this Court formulated the following questions in view of the serious security concerns posed by such construction, and referred the matter to the Hon'ble the Chief Justice for being taken on the judicial side -
1. Who is constructing the building and at whose instance it is being constructed?
2. Whether such person has right and title over the land on which the construction is being made?
3. Whether the map of the building has been duly approved by the Patna Municipal Corporation and the construction is in accordance with the approved plan?
4. What is the proposed use of the building?
2. The matter was registered as public interest litigation and directed by Hon'ble the Chief Justice to be placed before the present Special Bench for its consideration.
3. As observed above, the very purpose for taking up this matter was the serious security concern for Judges, lawyers, litigants, staff and security personnel alike, having regar
Andhra Pradesh vs. L V A Dixitulu
Aneesh Kumar V S vs. State of Kerala
Ashok Kumar Sonkar vs. Union of India
Babu Verghese vs. Bar Council of Kerala
Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India
Bank of India vs. Vijay Transport
BGS SGS Soma JV vs. NHPC Limited
British Airways Plc. vs. Union of India
Chhattisgarh State Co-operative Bank Maryadit vs. Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit
Chintels India Limited vs. Bhayana Builders Private Limited
Deep Chand vs. State of Rajasthan
Friends Colony Development Committee vs. State of Orissa
Herrington vs. British Railways Board
Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action vs. Union of India & Others
Jindal Stainless Limited vs. State of Haryana
K C P Ltd. vs. State Trading Corporation of India
K. Veeraswami vs. Union of India
Kerala State Coastal Zone Management Authority vs. State of Kerala
Kerala State Science & Technology Museum vs. Rambal Co.
Kesho Nath Khurana vs. Union of India
Krishan Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan
London Graving Dock Co. Ltd. vs. Horton, (1951) AC 737, 761 : (1951)-2 All ER 1
M. Siddiq (Ram Janmabhumi Temple-5 J.) vs. Suresh Das
M/s Amar Nath Om Prakash vs. State of Punjab
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others vs. M/S. Sunbeam High Tech Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh vs. State of Vindhya Pradesh
Rishabh Agro Industries Ltd. vs. P N B Capital Services Ltd.
Samaresh Chandra Bose vs. District Magistrate Burdwan
Sangeeta Singh vs. Union of India
Shivashakti Sugars Limited vs. Shree Renuka Sugar Limited
Sreenivasa General Traders vs. State of A.P.
State of Punjab vs. Salil Sabhlok
State of U.P. and others vs. Deshraj
State of U.P. vs. Singhara Singh
Sundeep Kumar Bafna vs. State of Maharashtra
Supreme Court Bar Association vs. Union of India
Union of India vs. National Federation of the Blind
Unique Butyle Tube Industries (P) Ltd. vs. U P Financial Corporation
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.