Back
ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, VIKASH JAIN, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Suo Motu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
Key Points: - Point 1 (!) - Point 2 (!) - Point 3 (!) - Point 4 (!) - Point 5 (!) - Point 6 (!) - Point 7 (!) - Point 8 (!) - Point 9 (!) - Point 10 (!)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of public interest litigation based on security concerns. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claim of waqf properties based on historical usage. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding the approval process of building plans. (Para 14 , 17) |
| 4. discussion on the legal interpretations of relevant bye-laws. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's request for original documents for clarity. (Para 34 , 35) |
| 6. conclusion that structure must be demolished due to illegal construction. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 7. distinction between illegal and irregular construction. (Para 71 , 72) |
| 8. need for preserving heritage buildings in the context of urban development. (Para 77 , 96) |
| 9. reference to the parameters of consideration set by the chief justice. (Para 129 , 131) |
| 10. judicial discretion in ensuring compliance with bye-laws. (Para 162 , 168) |
| 11. final affirmation of structural invalidity and directive for demolition. (Para 233) |
JUDGMENT
Vikash Jain, J. - Noticing, during the hearing of Cr.W.J.C. No. 887 of 2013 and an analogous case on 01.03.2021, a huge structure being constructed in close proximity of the northern side of the newly inaugurated Centenary Building of the Patna High Court, this Court fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
