Back
P. B. BAJANTHRI
Ashutosh Ranjan, Son of Rajendra Prasad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India through Director General, CISF, New Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:
3. The petitioner has questioned the validity of the di
Point of Law : Territorial jurisdiction - Prior to Constitutional (Fifteenth Amendment Act, 1963, concept of cause of action was alien for adjudication of disputes by High Court under Article 226 of ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the cause of action must arise within the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court for the exercise of power under Article 226 of the Consti....
A High Court's jurisdiction under Article 226(2) requires that part of the cause of action arises within its territorial limits.
High Court's jurisdiction to entertain a writ petition under Article 226 is contingent upon the presence of a cause of action within its territorial limits, as clarified by recent rulings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
