IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Ashutosh Kumar, Partha Sarthy
Sandeep Kumar, Son of Sri Sitaram Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ashutosh Kumar, ACJ
The petitioner has challenged the validity of Rules 5, 6 and Appendix-1 of Indira Gandhi Institute of Cardiology Medical Service (Amendment) Rules, 2023 introduced by way of notification contained in Memo No. 487(17) dated 13.05.2023 whereby the Indira Gandhi Institute of Cardiology Medical Service Rules of 2022 (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules of 2022"), relating to eligibility and manner of appointment of the Director of Indira Gandhi Institute of Cardiology (hereinafter referred to as “the IGIC”) has been changed, which according to the petitioner is manifestly illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India as also repugnant to the Central Law on the subject.
2. Apart from this major challenge, the other reliefs prayed for are quashing and setting aside of Rule 17 of Rules of 2022 whereby it has been prescribed that the officers appointed prior to coming into force of the Rule would be entitled to be considered for promotion in terms of earlier notifications prior to coming into force of Indira Gandhi Institute of Cardiology Medical Service Rules , 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules of 2014”) as this also i
The State's amendment to reduce qualifications for the Director post at a cardiology institute was upheld as within its legislative competence, establishing distinctions conforming to the institution....
The court affirmed that employers have the discretion to set educational qualifications for posts, which is not subject to judicial review unless found arbitrary or illegal.
Recruitment - plea raised by the petitioners is fallacious - As mere acquiring of qualification at a relevant point of time cannot give rise to an expectation, much less, legitimate expectation of ap....
Rules and Regulations framed under the repealing Act shall prevail as per Section 61(2).
It is clear that for maintaining standards of education in schools, NCTE is now specifically empowered to determine qualifications of persons for being recruited as teachers in schools or colleges.
The judgment emphasizes the significance of possessing the minimum educational qualification for appointment on a government post and upholds the binding nature of Regulations framed by the Medical C....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointment of the Dean cum Director must be made in accordance with the Regulations and Rules, and the State Government was directed to c....
Point of law: A criterion which has the effect of denying a candidate his right to be considered for the post on the principle that he is having higher qualification than prescribed cannot be rationa....
The Board of Governors of IIT Kanpur has the authority to establish recruitment rules and qualifications, and courts should not interfere in policy matters unless there is a clear legal error.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.