IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
HARISH KUMAR, J.
CWJC No. 5711 of 2025
(23.12.2025)
Rishu Ranjan ... Petitioner
vs.
Examination controller of BCCEB, ailey Road, Patna & Ors. ... Respondents
Education – MBBS Course – Cancellation of admission – National Testing Agency [NTA] is competent authority to take appropriate action against candidate who is found to have used unfair means in NEET (UG)-2024 Examination – Crime in relation to breach of integrity in chain of custody/leakage of NEET (UG) 2024 Examination question paper for admission into undergraduate was undertaken by an organized gang in collusion with some of students and exam personnel and investigation has been referred to CBI – Investigation has categorically revealed complicity of various accused – There is suspected complicity of petitioner in crime – No cogent reason to interfere with impugned order – Writ Petition dismissed – However, authorities/investigating officer shall take all sincere efforts to conclude investigation as earliest so that bonafide and genuine student be saved from stringent consequences of criminal cases. (Paras 17, 18, 20 and 21)
Constitution of India – Article 21 – Right of speedy trial – Article 21 of Constitution of India creates right in favour of accused to be tried speedily – Right of speedy trial flowing from Article 21 encompasses all stages, investigation, inquiry, trial, appeal, revision and retrial – However, it is neither advisable nor practicable to fix any time-limit for trial of offences as well as investigation where crime is widespread in nature across the nation – To determine whether undue delay has occurred, one must have regard to nature of offence and in an investigation being conducted by CBI, no barrier is to be fixed – However, it is always expected that investigation must be completed within a reasonable period of time. (Paras 19)
Harish Kumar, J.—Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner, a 1st year student of MBBS course for the session 2024-29, has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court seeking quashing of the order cancelling his admission bearing No. NMCH/PO/25/84 dated 17.02.2025 issued by the Principal, Narayan Medical College & Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Rohtas issued in consequent to the order No. 188/25 dated 11.02.2025 by the Examination Controller of Bihar Combined Entrance Competitive Examination Board, Patna (hereinafter referred to the ‘BCECE Board’) as also the show cause notice dated 23.10.2024 issued by the National Testing Agency (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NTA’). The petitioner also sought a direction to restore his admission in MBBS course and stay the operation of the impugned orders as afore noted.
3. The facts, as briefly, narrated in the writ petition are the petitioner, after having duly qualified the NEET(UG)-2024 Examination conduced by the NTA, was called upon for counselling by the BCECE Board, Patna and accordingly letter for admission was sent to the petitioner. The petitioner was finally admitted in Narayan Medical College & Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Rohtas. While the petitioner was pursuing 1st year course of MBBS, a show cause notice was issued by the NTA under letter bearing F.No.2024/CBI/264 dated 23.10.24 with an imputation that he was suspected to use unfair means in NEET (UG)-2024 Examination held on 5th May, 2024 and till further order the result of the petitioner’s NEET (UG)-2024 Examination was withheld. It is the specific contention of the petitioner that the afore noted show cause notice has never been served upon him and all on a sudden, Memo No. 188/2025 dated 11.02.2025 issued under the signature of the Examination Controller, BCECE, Board came to be passed directing the Institute in which the students were admitted to cancel their candidature and informed the Board. Consequently, the Principal of the Narayan Medical College & Hospital, Jamuhar, Sasaram, Rohtas vide order dated 17.02.2025 cancelled the admission of the petitioner with immediate effect and directed to vacate the hostel within 48 hours. It is these orders which are put to challenge by filing the present writ petition.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner while assailing the order of cancellation of the candidature of the petitioner has submitted that with respect to the paper leak and malpractices played by the candidates during the NEET (UG)-2024 Examination, a case was duly registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) bearing Crime No. 358/2024 dated 05.05.2024, wherein neither the petitioner was named as accused nor during the course of investigation any cogent materials have been collected and charge-sheet has been submitted, against the petitioner, albeit only suspecting the use of unfair means, the candidature of the petitioner and the admission in the concerned College came to be cancelled. The petitioner has neither been served any notice nor any opportunity was afforded before cancellation of his admission. The entire career has been put on jeopardy without there being any material brought on record. The investigation is yet being conducted by the CBI and no final report has been submitted. Hence, keeping the entire career of the petitioner in lurch for an indefinite period would serve no purpose. In case the CBI comes to a definite conclusion based upon the scientific investigation suggesting the complicity of the petitioner in the crime leading to filing of the charge sheet, the cancellation of admission may be said to be justified. However, in the present case where more than one and a half years have been elapsed and the charge-sheet has not been submitted, nonetheless the impugned orders came to be passed in hot haste manner. In case the petitioner would not be sent up for trial, there is no mode and manner to compensate the petitioner, much less, suspicion howsoever strong cannot take place of proof. In the afores
The court emphasized the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, while stating that ongoing investigations into alleged examination malpractice must conclude to ensure fair treatment of innocent ca....
The court affirmed that admissions obtained through fraud are invalid, emphasizing that principles of natural justice do not apply in such cases.
The court upheld the university's decision to cancel examinations due to proven use of unfair means, affirming that due process was followed, according to the governing ordinance.
National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (UG) 2024 – Leakage of question paper – No student who is revealed to have engaged in acts of fraud or to have been beneficiary of malpractice would be entitled....
(1) Cancellation of an examination, either for the purposes of gaining admission into professional and other courses or for the purpose of recruitment to a government post, is justified only in cases....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.