Back
ARIJIT BANERJEE, RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Dev All Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Kolkata Municipal Corporation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and initial facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ownership rights over property and unauthorized constructions. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. objections to proceedings in writ court versus civil court. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. writ court's ruling on unauthorized construction. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. the importance of consent in property modifications. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. effects of mutation and modifications in property rights. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 7. legal interpretation regarding municipal actions and permissions. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. final determination and reaffirmation of previous judgments. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. final verdict on the appeals. (Para 27) |
JUDGMENT :
Rai Chattopadhyay, J.
1. The three appeals have arisen assailing a judgment and order of a learned Single Bench, dated December 15, 2016. Those are numbered as APO 45 of 2017, APO 46 of 2017 and APO 47 of 2017, respectively. All the three, as above have been heard analogously. Those are being disposed of by dint of this common judgment.
2. A writ petition being No. W.P.No.880 of 2011, was filed by two petitioners namely, (i) Larica Inn Private Limited (henceforth referred to as “Larica”) and (ii) Kanu Paul
The court affirmed the principle that statutory authorities must obtain the consent of all property owners before sanctioning additional construction, particularly when ownership rights are contested....
The court established that renovations deemed necessary for safety do not require additional permissions under the KMC Act, provided they comply with existing regulations.
The court emphasized the importance of planned development and the need to address unauthorized constructions. It also highlighted the right of the petitioners, as owners, to be heard before the orde....
A writ petition challenging local authority actions is not maintainable when alternative statutory remedies are available, especially if a related appeal is pending.
Point of law: writ petition was not barred by either on the principles of res judicata or constructive res judicata. In the peculiar facts of the case since the issues referred to supra namely issue ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Corporation Officers must comply with the principles enshrined in Article 14 of the Constitution of India, treat everyone equally, and not....
In a suit for injunction alleging illegal construction, the Court must consider all relevant evidence, including the building plan sanctioned by the Municipal Authority, and implead the Municipal Aut....
Consent of existing flat owners is mandatory for modifications to original building plans under relevant statutes, and failure to secure such consent renders subsequent constructions illegal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
