Back
SUGATO MAJUMDAR
Chandra Devi Bothra – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of property rights and historical leases. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. defendants' legal defenses and claims against the suit. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. issues framed for court determination. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. examination of the suit's maintainability and jurisdiction. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. debate on legislative amendments and impact on the current suit. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. outcome of discussions on jurisdictional authority. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. limitation claims and implications for the suit. (Para 34 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. legal definitions and implications surrounding thika tenancy. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 9. examination of tenant status and rights. (Para 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 10. summary verdict and orders of the court. (Para 88 , 89 , 90) |
JUDGMENT :
SUGATO MAJUMDAR, J.
1. This is a suit for declaration, recovery of possession, mesne profits and other reliefs.
2. The nutshell of the plaint case is that one Nagendra Nath Sett, by an indenture of trust dated 12/03/1946 created a trust estate appointing his wife Kshetramani Dassi as one of the trustees. The said Kshetramani Dassi, since deceased, executed a registered deed of lease on 11/10/1966 commencing on and from 01/09/1966 for a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
