IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
OM NARAYAN RAI, J.
Ashok Kumar Gorain – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
WPA 11601 of 2025
Decided On : 08-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges refusal to renew permit. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments address tax demands without countersignature. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10 , 24) |
| 3. review of statutory provisions guiding permit renewal. (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 4. interpretation of renewal and countersignature requirements. (Para 15 , 18 , 20) |
| 5. court rules against tax demand prior to countersignature. (Para 26 , 28) |
Judgment :
Om Narayan Rai, J.
1. This writ petition assails the refusal on the part of the State Transport Authority, West Bengal to countersign the renewal of the petitioner’s permit bearing no. PSTS - 14/09 (WB) for his Vehicle No. JH-09AR-0684 in respect of the route Ranchi to Chirkunda (extended up to Asansol) despite the same being forwarded to it by the State Transport Authority, Jharkhand as far back as on January 21, 2025.
2. Briefly summed up, the case run in the writ petition is as follows: -
a) The petitioner owns a vehicle bearing no. JH-09AR-0684 in respect whereof he had obtained a Permanent Stage Carriage Permit bearing no. P.S.TS.No.14/09(WB) from the State Transport Authority, Jharkhand.
b) Such permit was lastly renewed by the said State Transport Authority, Jharkhand on January 16, 2025 for a period of 5 years till January 19, 2029 with effect from January 20, 2024.
c) Having thus renewed the permanent stage carriage permit of the petitioner, the Secretary, State Transport Authority, Jharkhand issued a Memo being Pari-Ayu-1462/2008/STA dated January 16, 2025 to the Secretary State Transport Authority, West Bengal thereby indicating that the permanent stage carriage permit in respect of the petitioner’s vehicle was initially valid till January 19, 2024 and that upon renewal its validity had been extended up to January 19, 2029. By the said letter the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal was also requested to countersign the said renewed permit.
d) Thereafter on January 21, 2025, the petitioner made an application before the State Transport Authority, West Bengal for countersigning the renewed permit along with the approved time table issued by the State Transport Authority, Jharkhand. The petitioner’s application requesting for such countersignature has been refused by the respondent no. 2 i.e. the Regional Transport Authority and Ex-officio Assistant Director, State Transport Authority, West Bengal by a Memo bearing no. I/610950/2025 dated February 25, 2025 observing as follows: -
“I am directed to request you to collect Additional Tax and M.V. Tax in connection with the subject as mentioned above with effect from 20/01/2024 to 19/01/2029 with fine (Quarterly/Yearly basis), to Tax and Addl. Tax may be paid 01/04/2024 onwards.”
e) Feeling aggrieved by such refusal, the writ petitioner has approached this Court by filing the instant writ petition.
3. The respondent no.3 has filed a Report in the form of an Affidavit whereby the said respondent has sought to justify the demand of tax. In the said report it has been contended that when the permit had originally been issued in the year 2009 by the State Transport Authority, Jharkhand, the same had been duly countersigned by the State Transport Authority, West Bengal and that since the said permit has been renewed on January 16, 2025 for five years with effect from January 20, 2024 till January 19, 2029, therefore, in terms of the proviso to Section 81(1) of the said Act of 1988, the countersignature that was done prior to the date of renewal thereof (i.e. January 16, 2025) would remain effective for the renewed validity period “so as to synchronise with the validity of the primary permit”. Provisions of Sections 6 and 7 of the West Bengal Additional Tax and One Time Tax on Motor Vehicles Act, 1989 (hereafter “the said Additional Tax Act of 1989”) have also been quoted and relied on in the said report.
4. Mr. Bhattacharya, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submitted that the State Transport Authority, West Bengal had acted without jurisdicti
Bolani Ores Ltd. vs. State of Orissa.
International Tourist Corporation & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors.
Mahindra And Mahindra Financial Services Ltd. vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Gajraj Singh & Ors. vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal & Ors.
Tax obligations cannot be imposed absent the requisite countersignature on interstate vehicle permits, with permit renewal constituting a fresh permit under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Permits granted under the Motor Vehicles Act remain valid during appeal periods, negating tax demands for operating without valid permits.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the mandatory requirement of reciprocal agreements between states for granting inter-State route permits, and the need for publication of any ch....
The Transport Authority can impose a deterrent penalty under Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act for repeated violations of permit conditions, and the absence of agreement on the penalty does not....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.