IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
OM NARAYAN RAI, J.
Apu Sinha – Appellant
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors. – Respondent
WPA 14022 of 2025
Decided On : 08-08-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of the cancellation of transport permit (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding exorbitant fine imposition (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. state's argument on habitual violations (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's findings on permit violations and proposed fine (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. deterrent measures for repeated traffic violations (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. distinction of case law on repeated offences (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. conclusion on dismissal of writ petition (Para 16 , 17) |
Judgment :
Om Narayan Rai, J.
1. This writ petition assails an order dated April 21, 2025 passed by the Board of the State Transport Authority, West Bengal.
2. The facts of the case as may be culled out from the material on record are as follows:-
a) The petitioner owns a bus. It was thus far being plied on the route Sonakania to Karunamoyee on the strength of an Inter-Regional State Carriage Permit issued in his favour.
b) On or about April 22, 2024, the petitioner’s vehicle was unauthorisedly halted by the petitioner’s own staff at CBT, Esplanade. Since the halt was in violation of the permit conditions, a fine of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed on the petitioner by a challan dated April 22, 2024.
c) Subsequently, a Memo bearing No. 443/STA/SC dated July 3, 2024 was issued by the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal whereby the petitioner was directed to show-cause as to why should the petitioner’s permit not be cancelled for violation of the permit conditions.
d) The petitioner failed to give any suitable reply to the said show- cause notice as the petitioner had allegedly not received the same within time. Consequently the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal issued an order dated August 6, 2024 whereby the petitioner’s permit was suspended for three months and the petitioner was directed to surrender the permit.
e) The petitioner represented against the said order dated August 06, 2024 by a letter dated September 02, 2024 and prayed for withdrawal of the said order of suspension but the State Transport Authority, West Bengal did not pay heed to the petitioner’s request. The petitioner, therefore, had to suffer the order of suspension of his permit for three months.
f) In the meantime, on August 12, 2024 the petitioner’s vehicle crossed Rabindra Setu, Howrah Bridge violating the permit conditions for the second time, wherefore another challan imposing fine of Rs. 10,000/- was issued against the petitioner.
g) Thereafter, the petitioner’s vehicle was found to have violated the permit conditions for a third time on September 09, 2024 and a further challan imposing another fine of Rs.10,000/- was issued against the petitioner.
h) Subsequently, the Secretary, State Transport Authority, West Bengal issued an order dated November 29, 2024 thereby cancelling the petitioner’s permit.
i) Upon receiving such order dated November 29, 2024 whereby the petitioner’s permit had been cancelled, the petitioner made a representation before the State Transport Authority, West Bengal on December 9, 2024 seeking withdrawal of the said order of cancellation of his permit. The said representation did not yield any positive result.
j) Being aggrieved thereby the petitioner approached this Court by filing a writ petition being WPA No. 624 of 2025. The said writ petition was disposed of by an order dated March 18, 2025 thereby directing the respondent no. 2 in the writ petition to consider and decide the representation submitted by the petitioner after affording an opportunity of hearing to him. It was further directed that the said respondent would consider if the petitioner’s case could be “covered under the provision of Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act or not” and that if “upon consideration the said respondent came to an affirmative decision it would recall its order dated November 29, 2024 and pass necessary orders in terms of Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988”.
k) In terms of the said order, the petitioner was afforded an opportunity of being heard by th
The Transport Authority can impose a deterrent penalty under Section 86(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act for repeated violations of permit conditions, and the absence of agreement on the penalty does not....
Permits granted under the Motor Vehicles Act remain valid during appeal periods, negating tax demands for operating without valid permits.
Tax obligations cannot be imposed absent the requisite countersignature on interstate vehicle permits, with permit renewal constituting a fresh permit under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Compliance with statutory provisions and unreasonable delay in challenging administrative actions.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.