IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
Mahendar Kumar Goyal, J.
Ashoka Transport Company, Through Proprietor Gaurav Sherawat - Petitioner
Versus
The Regional Transport Authority, Alwar Region - Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10598 of 2022
Decided On : 04-11-2022
Counter-signature - Transport Permit - Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 2(31), Section 66, Section 72, Section 81, Section 86, Section 88 - The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the order declining to countersign the transport permit issued by the Government of NCT, Delhi for the route Delhi to Alwar via Haryana. The court analyzed the statutory scheme for grant of Stage Carriage permits and its countersignature under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. It referred to the legal provisions and noted that the right of an operator to ply a vehicle on an inter-State route is governed by the reciprocal agreement entered into by the States concerned. The court highlighted the provisions of Section 88 and cited relevant case laws to establish that the refusal to countersign the pre-existing permit was in line with the statutory scheme. The court found that the subject route was a new route and the proper procedure for issuance of permit and countersignature was yet to be followed. Therefore, the court dismissed the writ petition.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a Transport Operator, sought to quash the order declining to countersign the transport permit issued by the Government of NCT, Delhi for the route Delhi to Alwar via Haryana. The permit was initially issued in 1944 and was renewed from time to time. The petitioner requested the State of Rajasthan to countersign the permit as per the gazette notification dated 1.12.2021, but the request was refused. The petitioner's appeal against the refusal was dismissed by the State Transport Appellate Tribunal.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the refusal to countersign the pre-existing permit was in line with the statutory scheme. It noted that the right of an operator to ply a vehicle on an inter-State route is governed by the reciprocal agreement entered into by the States concerned. The court highlighted the provisions of Section 88 and cited relevant case laws to establish that the refusal was justified. The court also found that the subject route was a new route and the proper procedure for issuance of permit and countersignature was yet to be followed.
Issues: The issues involved in the case were the refusal to countersign the transport permit issued by the Government of NCT, Delhi for the route Delhi to Alwar via Haryana, and the interpretation of the statutory provisions governing the grant of Stage Carriage permits and their countersignature under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the statutory provisions, particularly Section 88 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, and the legal principles established in relevant case laws. The court emphasized the importance of reciprocal agreements between the States concerned in determining the right of an operator to ply a vehicle on an inter-State route.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the writ petition seeking to quash the order declining to countersign the transport permit. The court found that the refusal to countersign the pre-existing permit was justified under the statutory scheme, and the proper procedure for issuance of permit and countersignature for the subject route was yet to be followed.
JUDGMENT :
1. This writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 11.7.2022 passed by the learned State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur (for brevity-’the STAT’) whereby, the Appeal No.4/2022 preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 13.6.2022 passed by the Regional Transport Officer, Alwar, declining request of the petitioner to countersign the permit No.IS/Alwar/2 route Delhi to Alwar, has been dismissed.
2. The necessary facts leading to the present writ petition are that the petitioner is a Transport Operator and was issued a permit No.IS/Alwar/2 route Delhi to Alwar via Haryana initially in the year 1944 which was renewed from time to time and was countersigned by the Transport Department, Government of Rajasthan, valid till 8.12.2008. An agreement entered amongst the States of Rajasthan, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi NCR and published under Section 88(5) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for brevity-’the Act of 1988’) vide Rajasthan gazette notification dated 1.12.2021, provided for countersignature by the State of Rajasthan on two permits for the Stage Carriage Buses issued by the Delhi NCR on the Delhi-Alwar via Haryana route. The subject permit issued to the petitioner was validated from 12.12.2018 to 11.12.2023 by the Government of NCT, Delhi which was requested by the petitioner to be countersigned by the State of Rajasthan under its obligation as per the gazette notification dated 1.12.2021; but, the respondent, vide its letter dated 31.1.2022, refused to countersign the same on the premise that it was issued prior to publication of gazette notification dated 1.12.2021. The refusal was despite recommendation of the Transport Authority, Delhi to countersign the permit till its validity as also the letter dated 25.4.2022 issued by the Secretary (STA)/Special Commissioner, Government of NCT of Delhi stating therein that the subject permit may be treated as issued from the date of dispatch of the letter, i.e., after issuance of the gazette notification. An appeal preferred thereagainst by the petitioner has been dismissed by the learned STAT vide its judgement dated 11.7.2022, subject matter of challenge. Relying upon the Note appended to Annexure “B” (B1), it is claimed that the permit issued by the State of Delhi prior to publication of the gazette notification was to be treated as valid permit for the purpose of countersignature. It is, therefore, prayed in the writ petition that the judgement dated 11.7.2022 be quashed and set aside and the respondents may be directed to countersign the permit issued by the Government of NCT in petitioner’s favour.
3. The respondents have, in their reply, stated that since there exists no clause in the agreement dated 31.8.2021 published in the State gazette on 1.12.2021 which was executed superseding all the previous agreements, to consider the permit issued earlier as part of the agreement, the subject permit issued to the petitioner valid for the period from 12.12.2018 dated 11.12.2023, was not countersigned. It is further stated that the subject permit is issued for the route Delhi to Alwar under Annexure-A1 of the agreement which is not suffixed with a note that a permit issued prior to the agreement will be its part and hence, they have rightly refused to countersign the same. It is, therefore, prayed that the writ petition be dismissed.
4. The respondents in their additional affidavit dated 3.8.2022 filed through Shri Kanhaiya Lal Swami, the Commissioner, Transport and Road Safety Department, Government of Rajasthan, stated that the agreement amongst the States of Delhi and Rajasthan, Delhi and Uttar Pradesh, Delhi and Haryana, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Haryana and Uttar Pradesh and Haryana is as per Annexures A to F of the said agreement and each Annexure is applicable qua the respective two States mentioned in the agreement for the route or its portion. As per Annexure-A of the earlier transport agreement of the year 2010 execute
A. Venkatakrishnan vs. State Transport Authority, Kerala
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Ltd., Jaipur vs. R.T.A., Bikaner & Ors.
The inclusion of a route in an inter-State agreement is invalid if it violates the Area Approved Scheme and principles of natural justice.
Compliance with statutory provisions and unreasonable delay in challenging administrative actions.
Permits granted under the Motor Vehicles Act remain valid during appeal periods, negating tax demands for operating without valid permits.
Tax obligations cannot be imposed absent the requisite countersignature on interstate vehicle permits, with permit renewal constituting a fresh permit under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.