RAMESH SINHA, NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI
Govind Sahu S/o Shri Harishankar Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home – Respondent
ORDER :
Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J.
1. Since both the above appeals arise out of same order, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard Mr. A.K. Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant Govind Sahu in WA No. 106/2022, Mr. C.K. Kesharwani, learned counsel for appellant Ravindra Singh Goutam in WA No. 170/2022 and Mr. Gagan Tiwari, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent/State.
3. The present intra Court appeals have been filed against the order dated 13-10-2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPS No.267/2012 (Ravindra Singh Goutam and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others), whereby the writ petition filed by the appellants has been dismissed.
4. Facts of the case as projected in the writ petition are that the appellants Ravindra Singh and Govind Kumar Sahu were appointed in police department as Constable in the years 2009. It is alleged that on 11. 04.2010 at 10.00 P.M., the appellants booked two rooms for stay with two girls in the Mayank Hotel, Raipur and on information received by the Station House Officer, Police Station Gol Bazar that two persons are staying at Mayank Hotel by presenting themselves as Crime Branch
B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India
Kukkikatte Krishnamoorty Vs. Union of India and anr.
Praveen Kumar Vs. Union of India & Ors.
State of A.P. v. Mohd. Nasrullah Khan
State of Karnataka and anr. Vs. Umesh
State of Karnataka v. N. Gangaraj
Union of India and ors. Vs. Constable Sunil Kumar
Union of India v. G. Ganayutham
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.