Back
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Durga Sharan Chandra S/o Shri I. L. Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The matters were listed in motion hearing but in view of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench in Writ Appeal No. 383 of 2022 in case of Subir Sen vs. State of Chhattisgarh passed on 20.07.2022, this Court vide its order dated 22-08-2022 has directed both the cases to be listed for final disposal in motion hearing and accordingly the matters are being heard finally.
2. Since the identical facts and law are involved in both the writ petitions i.e. W.P. (S) No. 2951 of 2022 and W.P. (S) No. 2988 of 2022, they are being heard analogously and disposed of by this common order.
3. The petitioners who were working as Assistant Professor with the respondents No. 2 and 3 have challenged the termination order dated 17.02.2022 (Annexure P/1) passed in view of resolution dated 16-02-2022 (Annexure P/9) and also prayed for quashing of the entire departmental inquiry. The petitioners have also prayed for reinstatement with all consequential benefits.
4. Brief facts as reflected from the records of both the cases are that the respondents No. 2 and 3 is the College run by the society registered under the Societies Act. The college run by the society is an unaided education insti
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against a private unaided minority institution for service dis....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a service dispute involving a private educational institution and its employee is not amenable to challenge under Article 226 of the Constitut....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the authority's power to terminate services under Rule 15(ii) of the Anandalaya Education Society (Service conditions, discipline, conduct and appe....
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against a private unaided minority educational institution. A service dispute in the private realm involving a priva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner, as an employee of a school with a public element in imparting education, was entitled to avail the remedy under Article 226 of....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
