SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 1978

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Manmohan, Asha Menon, JJ.
Binit Kumar - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 8341 of 2019
Decided On : 27-01-2021

Advocates appeared:
Pallavi Awasthi, Advocate, Vikas Mahajan, Advocate

The main legal point established in the judgment is the grant of pro rata pension to the petitioner based on similarity to other petitioners in related cases.

Headnote:

Pension - Pro Rata Pension - Grant of relief to petitioner

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner sought pro rata pension similar to other petitioners in related cases. The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant the petitioner the same relief as granted in those petitions, including payment of arrears of pro rata pension and continuation of future payments.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner should be granted pro rata pension if similarly placed as other petitioners in related cases, and directed the Indian Air Force to pay arrears of pro rata pension and continue future payments. If not entitled, the reasons should be communicated to the petitioner with the opportunity to take further remedies.

Issues: The issue was whether the petitioner should be granted pro rata pension similar to other petitioners in related cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the petitioner's claim to be similarly placed to other petitioners in related cases and the direction to the Indian Air Force to grant the same relief as granted in those petitions.

Final Decision: The court directed the Indian Air Force to grant the petitioner the same relief as granted in related petitions, including payment of arrears of pro rata pension and continuation of future payments, with the opportunity for further remedies if not entitled.

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. - CM APPL.2709/2021

    Keeping in view the averments in the application, early hearing is allowed and with consent of parties, the matter is taken up for hearing today. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.

      W.P. (C) 8341/2019

      1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing.

      2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner in this petition claims to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and others,2020 SCCOnLineDel 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India,2019 SCCOnLineDel 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on enquiry, states that the requisite No Objection Certificate (NOC) had been given.

      4. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly states that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.

      5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioner to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant him the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioner. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioner, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioner, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioner shall be entitled to take further remedies there against.

      6. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.

      7. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top