Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Manmohan, Navin Chawla, JJ.
R. Velumani, Service No. 689836-S (Ex CPL) - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(C) 8592 of 2021 & CM Appl. 26598 of 2021 and W.P.(C) 8630 of 2021 & CM Appl. 26708 of 2021
Decided On : 18-08-2021
Important Points
Subject
Administrative Law - Pension Disputes
Headnote
(B) Delay in payment - Should payment of arrears not occur within twelve weeks, interest at 7% per annum shall accrue. (Paras 5)
Facts of the case:
Petitioners filed for pro rata pension claiming similarity with previous judgments to receive arrears from discharge date. Respondents acknowledge the petitions are in order subject to verification.
Findings of Court:
The court ordered the respondents to verify the petitioners' eligibility for pro rata pension in accordance with earlier rulings within twelve weeks.
Issues: The main issues include the confirmation of similar standing for the petitioners as in previous cases and the timeline for pension payment.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for timely verification of eligibility per earlier judgments to ensure fairness in pension distribution.
Result: Petitions disposed of with specific directives.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to pro rata pension based on similar placements (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. verification and appeal rights reserved (Para 3) |
| 3. (Para 4) |
| 4. interest accrued on delayed payment (Para 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Manmohan, J. (Oral)
The hearing has been done by way of video conferencing.
CM APPL. 26598/2021 in W.P.(C) 8592/2021
CM APPL. 26708/2021 in W.P.(C) 8630/2021
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.
W.P.(C) 8592/2021
W.P.(C) 8630/2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and Others, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, state that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the right of appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment in Brijlal Kumar (supra) being saved, the petition be disposed of.
4. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of directing the respondents Indian Air Force that within twelve weeks herefrom, if they find the petitioners to be similarly placed as the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra, to grant them the same relief as granted in those petitions i.e. by payment of arrears of pro rata pension from the date of discharge till the date of payment and in future to continue to pay pro rata pension to the petitioners. However, if on verification it is found that the petitioners, for any reason, are not entitled to pro rata pension for reasons other than those stated in the judgments in Govind Kumar Srivastava (supra) and Brijlal Kumar (supra) and other connected petitions supra being in personam, the respondents, within the said twelve weeks, shall communicate to the petitioners, not so found entitled, the reasons in writing thereof and in which event, the petitioners shall be entitled to take further remedies there against. Needless to state that if any documents are asked for by the respondents, the same shall be furnished by the petitioners within a week.
5. If the arrears of pro rata pension are not paid within twelve weeks, the same shall also incur interest thereon @ 7% per annum from the expiry of twelve weeks till the date of payment.
6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
