SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, NAVIN CHAWLA
R. Velumani, Service No. 689836-S (Ex CPL) – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. right to pro rata pension based on similar placements (Para 1 , 2)
2. verification and appeal rights reserved (Para 3)
3. (Para 4)
4. interest accrued on delayed payment (Para 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)

The hearing has been done by way of video conferencing.

CM APPL. 26598/2021 in W.P.(C) 8592/2021

CM APPL. 26708/2021 in W.P.(C) 8630/2021

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, the applications stand disposed of.

W.P.(C) 8592/2021

W.P.(C) 8630/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners state that the petitioners in these petitions claim to be similarly placed to the petitioners in Brijlal Kumar v. Union of India and Others, 2020 SCC OnLine Del 1477 and the petitioners in Govind Kumar Srivastava v. Union of India, 2019 SCC OnLine Del 6425 (DB) [against which Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 8813/2019 has been dismissed on 26th April, 2019] and seeks the same relief as claimed therein i.e. of pro rata pension.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on enquiry, state that the requisite No Objection Certificates (NOCs) had been given.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents fairly state that subject to the right to verification and the ri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top