GAURANG KANTH
D. T. C. – Appellant
Versus
Salek Chand – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
GAURANG KANTH, J.
1. The present petition emanates from the order dated 15.09.2000 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal No. II, Tis Hazari court, Delhi (“Impugned Order -I”) and order dated 03.10.2002 passed by the Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal- II, Karkardooma Courts Delhi (“Impugned Order-II”). The Impugned Order-I and Impugned Order-II would collectively be also referred to as Impugned Orders, where so required. The Petitioner hereby is impugning the legality of the aforesaid Impugned Orders and is seeking issuance of an appropriate writ for quashing the said Impugned Orders.
2. A brief factual matrix shows that the Petitioner filed an Application under Section 33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (“I.D. Act”) seeking the approval of the learned Labour Court for terminating the services of the Respondent. Learned Labour Court adjudicated on the issue of validity of the domestic enquiry conducted by the Petitioner/Management and vide Impugned Order-I held that the said domestic enquiry was conducted after following the principles of natural justice and therefore there is no fault in the enquiry proceedings. However, after analyzing the
Cholan Roadways Ltd. Vs. Thirugnanasambandam reported as 2005(3) SCC 241
Dilip Mani Dubey Vs M/s SIEL Limited & Anr. reported as 2019(4) SCC 534
John D’Souza Vs Karnataka State Transport Corporation
Lalla Ram Vs. D.C.M. Works Ltd. reported as (1978) 3 SCC 1
Martin Burn Ltd. vs R.N. Banerjee (AIR 1958 SC 79)
Mysore Steel Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs Jitendra Chandra Kar and Others reported as (1971) 1 LLJ 543 (SC)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.