Back
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Ct/cd Siddant Sindhu – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following reliefs:
"(a) To pass a writ of certiorari to set aside order no. CISF/DMRC/VIOLET-II/DSIC/UR-37/S.S/2022-2235 dated 23.07.2022.
(b) To pass a writ of Mandamus Or any Appropriate Writ, Order of Direction Directing Respondents No To Take Any Further Adverse Action Against The Petitioner."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents on advance notice informs this Court that against the impugned Order dated 23.07.2022, the petitioner has filed appeal in September, 2022, however, the said appeal is pending consideration, thus the present petition is premature.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the filing of the appeal by the petitioner, however, she submits that the said appeal has been returned vide Order dated 21.11.2022. A Show-cause Notice dated 15.12.2022 has been issued against the petitioner.
4. The decisions so taken vide Order dated 21.11.2022 and thereafter, vide Order dated 15.12.2022, in our considered opinion, are not proper and not as per law on the ground that if the petitioner had made an Appeal which was not before the Competent Authority, it was the d
Duty of respondents to send appeal to Competent Authority and the improper nature of the decisions taken by the respondents
The High Court may issue a direction to a statutory authority to consider a pending representation and grant an interim stay on coercive action to ensure compliance with principles of natural justice....
The petition became moot after the petitioners received the order copy they initially claimed not to have received.
The necessity of providing a hearing before executing actions that affect a party's rights is essential in law.
Settlement of a criminal matter can allow for the quashing of proceedings against the petitioner.
The judgment establishes that there is no provision for filing an appeal/application against the order of revision, and the petitioner can challenge the final order by way of revision before the conc....
The court affirms the necessity for timely administrative action upon petitioner's request, prioritizing justice and fairness in municipal matters.
Timely decision on appeal and communication of reasoned order.
The court's decision was centered around the principles of providing access to the order and ensuring fairness in the revisional trial process.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
